• Improving Uptake of Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment in a Remote Tailored Risk Communication and Navigation Intervention: Large Effect Size but Room to Grow.
    • Kinney AY, Walters ST, Lin Y, Lu SE, Kim A, Ani J, Heidt E, Le Compte CJG, O'Malley D, Stroup A, Paddock LE, Grumet S, Boyce TW, Toppmeyer DL, McDougall JA.
    • J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 14:JCO2200751. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00751. Epub ahead of print.

    Related:

    •• Identifier: NCT03326713: Genetic Risk Assessment for Cancer Education and Empowerment (GRACE) Project (GRACE). (ClinicalTrials.gov . Accessed 2023 Feb 14.)

    • Women's Metaphors About BRCA Gene Testing and How They Can Inform Health Communication Theory and Practice.
    • Martin SC, Scott AM, Stone AM.
    • Health Commun. 2023 Feb 12:1-13. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2178051. Epub ahead of print.
    • Measuring high-risk parents' opinions about direct-to-consumer genetic testing for adult-onset inherited cancer syndromes in their adolescent and young adult children.
    • Hasser E, Peshkin BN, Hamilton JG, Brower J, Ovadia H, Friedman Ross L, Sacca R, Tarini B, Domchek SM, Vittone S, Sleiman M Jr, Isaacs C, Knerr S, Wilfond BS, Tercyak KP.
    • J Genet Couns. 2023 Feb 7. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1685. Epub ahead of print.
    • Role of psychological background in cancer susceptibility genetic testing distress: It is not only about a positive result.
    • López-Fernández A, Villacampa G, Salinas M, Grau E, Darder E, Carrasco E, Solanes A, Velasco A, Torres M, Munté E, Iglesias S, Torres-Esquius S, Tuset N, Diez O, Lázaro C, Brunet J, Corbella S, Balmaña J.
    • J Genet Couns. 2023 Feb 7. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1687. Epub ahead of print.
    • Predicting Openness of Communication in Families With Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome: Natural Language Processing Analysis.
    • Baroutsou V, Cerqueira Gonzalez Pena R, Schweighoffer R, Caiata-Zufferey M, Kim S, Hesse-Biber S, Ciorba FM, Lauer G, Katapodi M; CASCADE Consortium.
    • JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jan 19;7:e38399. doi: 10.2196/38399.
    • Coping Self-Efficacy and Its Relationship with Psychological Morbidity after Genetic Test Result Disclosure: Results from Cancer-Unaffected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers.
    • Isselhard A, Lautz Z, Töpper M, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Vitinius F, Fischer H, Berger-Höger B, Steckelberg A, Beifus K, Köberlein-Neu J, Stock S.
    • Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;20(3):1684. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031684.
    • Adding a genetic counseling assistant improves efficiency of hereditary cancer genetic counseling without impacting patient experience.
    • Cohen SA, Nixon DM, Lichtenberg E.
    • J Genet Couns. 2023 Jan 8. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1671. Epub ahead of print.
    • Genetic Testing in the Latinx community: Impact of acculturation and provider relationships.
    • Ioffe YJ, Hong L, Joachim-Célestin M, Soret C, Montgomery S, Unternaehrer JJ.
    • Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Dec 26;169:125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.12.001. Epub ahead of print.
    • Psychological factors and the uptake of preventative measures in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: results of a prospective cohort study.
    • Dick J, Tüchler A, Brédart A, Vitinius F, Wassermann K, Rhiem K, Schmutzler RK.
    • Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Dec 19;20(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00244-y.
    • Patient-reported outcomes associated with reflex BRCA1/2 tumor and subsequent germline panel genetic testing for high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
    • McCuaig JM, Stockley TL, Ferguson SE, Vicus D, Brennenstuhl S, Ott K, Kim RH, Metcalfe KA.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Dec 7. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1661. Epub ahead of print.
    • Yes, We Can, But Should We? Ethical Considerations in Reporting Germline Findings From Paired Tumor-Normal Genomic Testing in Patients With Advanced Cancer.
    • Hunter CL, Helft PR.
    • J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 5:JCO2200796. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00796. Epub ahead of print.
    • A digital pathway for genetic testing in UK NHS patients with cancer: BRCA-DIRECT randomised study internal pilot.
    • Torr B, Jones C, Choi S, Allen S, Kavanaugh G, Hamill M, Garrett A, MacMahon S, Loong L, Reay A, Yuan L, Valganon Petrizan M, Monson K, Perry N, Fallowfield L, Jenkins V, Gold R, Taylor A, Gabe R, Wiggins J, Lucassen A, Manchanda R, Gandhi A, George A, Hubank M, Kemp Z, Evans DG, Bremner S, Turnbull C.
    • J Med Genet. 2022 Dec;59(12):1179-1188. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108655. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

    Related:

    •• Trial registration number: ISRCTN87845055: BRCA-DIRECT- Is digitally delivered information about genetic testing feasible, effective and acceptable to women with breast cancer?. (ISRCTN registry)

    •• Press: UK Pilot Study Suggests Digital Pathway May Expand BRCA Testing in Breast Cancer. (GenomeWeb)

    • Clinical and psychological implications of secondary and incidental findings in cancer susceptibility genes after exome sequencing in patients with rare disorders.
    • Carrasco E, López-Fernández A, Codina-Sola M, Valenzuela I, Cueto-González AM, Villacampa G, Navarro V, Torres-Esquius S, Palau D, Cruellas M, Torres M, Perez-Dueñas B, Abulí A, Diez O, Sábado-Álvarez C, García-Arumí E, Tizzano EF, Moreno L, Balmaña J.
    • J Med Genet. 2022 Nov 29:jmg-2022-108929. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108929. Epub ahead of print.
    • UK Pilot Study Suggests Digital Pathway May Expand BRCA Testing in Breast Cancer.
    • [No author given]
    • GenomeWeb. The Scan. 2022 Nov 23.

    Related:

    •• Original research:

    A digital pathway for genetic testing in UK NHS patients with cancer: BRCA-DIRECT randomised study internal pilot.

    • Investigating Psychological Impact after Receiving Genetic Risk Results—A Survey of Participants in a Population Genomic Screening Program.
    • Zayac McCormick CZ, Dilzell Yu K, Johns A, Campbell-Salome G, Hallquist MLG, Sturm AC, Buchanan AH.
    • J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 22;12(12):1943. doi: 10.3390/jpm12121943.
    • Fatalism and metaphor in Confucianism: A qualitative study of barriers to genetic testing among first-degree relatives of hereditary cancer patients from China.
    • Jiang C, Liu L, Wang Y, Wu L, Zhang W, Wu X.
    • Psychooncology. 2022 Nov 15. doi: 10.1002/pon.6068. Epub ahead of print.
    • Development of a web-based, theory-guided narrative intervention for women at elevated risk for breast cancer.
    • Katz ML, Senter L, Reiter PL, Emerson B, Ennis AC, Shane-Carson KP, Aeilts A, Cassingham HR, Schnell PM, Agnese DM, Toland AE, Sweet K.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Oct 29:S0738-3991(22)00820-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.10.348. Epub ahead of print.
    • What happens in the long term: Uptake of cancer surveillance and prevention strategies among at-risk relatives with pathogenic variants detected via cascade testing.
    • Frey MK, Ahsan MD, Badiner N, Lin J, Narayan P, Nitecki R, Rauh-Hain JA, Moss H, Fowlkes RK, Thomas C, Bergeron H, Christos P, Levi SR, Blank SV, Holcomb K, Cantillo E, Sharaf RN, Lipkin S, Offit K, Chapman-Davis E.
    • Cancer. 2022 Oct 27. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34482. Epub ahead of print.
    • Latinx attitudes, barriers, and experiences with genetic counseling and testing: A systematic review.
    • Dron HA, Bucio D, Young JL, Tabor HK, Cho MK.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Oct 27. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1632. Epub ahead of print.
    • Risk reduction and screening of cancer in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline.
    • Sessa C, Balmaña J, Bober SL, Cardoso MJ, Colombo N, Curigliano G, Domchek SM, Evans DG, Fischerova D, Harbeck N, Kuhl C, Lemley B, Levy-Lahad E, Lambertini M, Ledermann JA, Loibl S, Phillips KA, Shimon P; ESMO Guidelines Committee.
    • Ann Oncol. 2022 Oct 19:S0923-7534(22)04193-X. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.004. Epub ahead of print.
    • Relatives from Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome Families Forgoing Genetic Testing: Findings from the Swiss CASCADE Cohort.
    • Sarki M, Ming C, Aceti M, Fink G, Aissaoui S, Bürki N, Graffeo R, Heinimann K, Zufferey MC, Monnerat C, Rabaglio M, Zürrer-Härdi U, Chappuis PO, Katapodi MC.
    • J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 19;12(10):1740. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101740.
    • Validation of the modified Chinese Information and Support Needs Questionnaire (ISNQ-C) for daughters of mothers with breast cancer.
    • Fang SY, Chen TC.
    • Palliat Support Care. 2022 Oct 11:1-9. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522001407. Epub ahead of print.
    • Barriers to completion of cascade genetic testing: how can we improve the uptake of testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome?
    • Kahn RM, Ahsan MD, Chapman-Davis E, Holcomb K, Nitecki R, Rauh-Hain JA, Fowlkes RK, Tubito F, Pires M, Christos PJ, Tkachuk K, Krinsky H, Sharaf RN, Offit K, Lipkin S, Frey MK.
    • Fam Cancer. 2022 Oct 8. doi: 10.1007/s10689-022-00316-x. Epub ahead of print.
    • Talking about Risk, UncertaintieS of Testing IN Genetics (TRUSTING): development and evaluation of an educational programme for healthcare professionals about BRCA1 & BRCA2 testing.
    • Fallowfield L, Solis-Trapala I, Starkings R, May S, Matthews L, Eccles D, Evans DG, Turnbull C, Crawford G, Jenkins V.
    • Br J Cancer. 2022 Oct;127(6):1116-1122. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01871-x. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
    • Integrating hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic counselling and testing into mainstream clinical practice: Legal and ethical challenges.
    • Charron M, Kaiser B, Dauge A, Gallois H, Lapointe J, Dorval M, Nabi H, Joly Y.
    • Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022 Oct;178:103797. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103797. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
    • Review
    • Investigating factors that influence genetic counselors' decisions to refer patients to mental health providers.
    • Hayes T, Cunningham M, Trepanier A.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Oct;31(5):1113-1124. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1582. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
    • Effects of diet education on empowerment for individuals who have an increased risk of developing breast or colon cancer: A pilot study.
    • Tlusty K, Jackson M, Riley B, Blase T.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Oct;31(5):1138-1147. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1584. Epub 2022 May 3.
    • Risk-reducing mastectomy decisions among women with mutations in high- and moderate- penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes.
    • Comeaux JG, Culver JO, Lee JE, Dondanville D, McArthur HL, Quinn E, Gorman N, Ricker C, Li M, Lerman C.
    • Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2022 Oct;10(10):e2031. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2031. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
    • Returning individual genomic results to population-based cohort study participants with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants.
    • Ohneda K, Hamanaka Y, Kawame H, Fuse N, Nagami F, Suzuki Y, Yamaguchi-Kabata Y, Shimada M, Masamune A, Aoki Y, Ishida T, Yamamoto M.
    • Breast Cancer. 2022 Sep 26. doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01404-7. Epub ahead of print.
    • Mainstream genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer provides a solid basis for patients to make a well-informed decision about genetic testing.
    • Bokkers K, Bleiker EMA, Hoogendam JP, Velthuizen ME, Schreuder HWR, Gerestein CG, Lange JG, Louwers JA, Koudijs MJ, Ausems MGEM, Zweemer RP.
    • Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Sep 8;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00238-w.
    • Comparison of psychological distress for breast, ovarian and colorectal cancer predisposition in a Spanish sample at high risk of hereditary cancer.
    • Costa-Requena G, Garcia-Garijo M, Richart-Aznar P, Segura-Huerta Á.
    • Eur J Cancer Prev. 2022 Sep 1;31(5):482-486. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000734. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
    • Assessment of psychosocial difficulties by genetic clinicians and distress in women at high risk of breast cancer: a prospective study.
    • Brédart A, Kop JL, Tüchler A, De Pauw A, Cano A, Dick J, Rhiem K, Devilee P, Schmutzler R, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Dolbeault S.
    • Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Sep;30(9):1067-1075. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01096-9. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
    • Psychological characteristics of Japanese patients and their family members receiving genetic counseling: A single-institute exploratory study.
    • Mochiki I, Okugawa Y, Hashizume R, Imai H, Ikejiri M, Ogura T, Nakatani K, Hori H.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Aug 25. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1629. Epub ahead of print.
    • How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research.
    • Woof VG, Howell A, McWilliams L, Gareth Evans D, French DP.
    • Br J Cancer. 2022 Aug 24. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01944-x. Epub ahead of print.
    • I know things now: The challenges for genetic counseling of adolescents with a family history of hereditary breast cancer.
    • Wilfond BS.
    • J Pediatr. 2022 Aug 16:S0022-3476(22)00728-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.08.019. Epub ahead of print.
    • Commentary

    Related:

    Original research:

    Mother and Daughter Perspectives on Genetic Counseling and Testing of Adolescents for Hereditary Breast Cancer Risk.

    • Impact of BRCA1/2 cascade testing on anxiety, depression, and cancer worry levels among unaffected relatives in a multiethnic Asian cohort.
    • Padmanabhan H, Mariapun S, Lee SY, Hassan NT, Lee DS, Meiser B, Wong SW, Lee YQ, Yip CH, Teo SH, Thong MK, Taib NAM, Yoon SY.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Aug 1. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1619. Epub ahead of print.
    • Further validation of the Perceptions of Uncertainties in Genome Sequencing scale among patients with cancer undergoing tumor sequencing.
    • Umstead KL, Campbell R, Napier CE, Bartley N, Best MC, Butow PN, Biesecker BB.
    • Clin Genet. 2022 Aug;102(2):110-116. doi: 10.1111/cge.14169. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
    • Experiences of individuals with a variant of uncertain significance on genetic testing for hereditary cancer risks: a mixed method systematic review.
    • Gould D, Walker R, Makari-Judson G, Seven M.
    • J Community Genet. 2022 Aug;13(4):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00600-4. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
    • Cancer patients' understandings of genetic variants of uncertain significance in clinical care.
    • Amano Y, Raz A, Timmermans S, Shkedi-Rafid S.
    • J Community Genet. 2022 Aug;13(4):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00594-z. Epub 2022 May 26.
    • Toward a better understanding of the experience of patients with moderate penetrance breast cancer gene pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants: A focus on ATM and CHEK2.
    • McCormick S, Hicks S, Wooters M, Grant C.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Aug;31(4):956-964. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1568. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
    • The Communication Chain of Genetic Risk: Analyses of Narrative Data Exploring Proband–Provider and Proband–Family Communication in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.
    • Pedrazzani C, Aceti M, Schweighoffer R, Kaiser-Grolimund A, Bürki N, Chappuis PO, Graffeo R, Monnerat C, Pagani O, Rabaglio M, Katapodi MC, Caiata-Zufferey M.
    • J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 29;12(8):1249. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081249.
    • Lessons Learned from the Pilot Phase of a Population-Wide Genomic Screening Program: Building the Base to Reach a Diverse Cohort of 100,000 Participants.
    • Allen CG, Lenert L, Hunt K, Jackson A, Levin E, Clinton C, Clark JT, Garrison K, Gallegos S, Wager K, He W, Sterba K, Ramos PS, Melvin C, Ford M, Catchpole K, McMahon L, Judge DP.
    • J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 27;12(8):1228. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081228.
    • A qualitative study of unaffected ATM and CHEK2 carriers: How participants make meaning of 'moderate risk' genetic results in a population breast cancer screening trial.
    • James JE, Riddle L, Caruncho M, Koenig BA, Joseph G.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Jul 25. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1617. Epub ahead of print.
    • Remote vs in-person BRCA1/2 non-carriers test disclosure: patients' choice during Covid-19 pandemic restriction.
    • Costanzo S, De Summa S, Maurmo L, Digennaro M, Patruno M, Paradiso A.
    • Fam Cancer. 2022 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s10689-022-00307-y. Epub ahead of print.
    • Precise, Genotype-First Breast Cancer Prevention: Experience With Transferring Monogenic Findings From a Population Biobank to the Clinical Setting.
    • Jürgens H, Roht L, Leitsalu L, Nõukas M, Palover M, Nikopensius T, Reigo A, Kals M, Kallak K, Kütner R, Budrikas K, Kuusk S, Valvere V, Laidre P, Toome K, Rekker K, Tooming M, Ülle Murumets, Kahre T, Kruuv-Käo K, Õunap K, Padrik P, Metspalu A, Esko T, Fischer K, Tõnisson N.
    • Front Genet. 2022 Jul 22;13:881100. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.881100.
    • Insight into how patients with prostate cancer interpret and communicate genetic test results: implications for families.
    • Leader AE, Mercado J, Klein A, Hyatt C, Gross L, Brandt R, Giri VN.
    • J Community Genet. 2022 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00603-1. Epub ahead of print.
    • The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study.
    • Forrest LE, Forbes Shepherd R, Tutty E, Pearce A, Campbell I, Devereux L, Trainer AH, James PA, Young MA.
    • J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 7;12(7):1112. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071112.
    • Women's thoughts on receiving and sharing genetic information: Considerations for genetic counseling.
    • Pfledderer CD, Gren LH, Frost CJ, Andrulis IL, Chung WK, Genkinger J, Glendon G, Hopper JL, John EM, Southey M, Terry MB, Daly MB.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Jul 6. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1599. Epub ahead of print.
    • Randomised trial of population based BRCA testing in Ashkenazi Jews: Long term secondary lifestyle behavioural outcomes.
    • Burnell M, Gaba F, Sobocan M, Desai R, Sanderson S, Loggenberg K, Gessler S, Side L, Brady AF, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Jacobs C, Legood R, Beller U, Tomlinson I, Wardle J, Menon U, Jacobs I, Manchanda R.
    • BJOG. 2022 Jul 4. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17253. Epub ahead of print.
    • Genetic clinicians' confidence in BOADICEA comprehensive breast cancer risk estimates and counselees' psychosocial outcomes: a prospective study.
    • Brédart A, De Pauw A, Tüchler A, Lakeman IMM, Anota A, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, van Asperen CJ, Devilee P, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Kop JL, Dolbeault S.
    • Clin Genet. 2022 Jul;102(1):30-39. doi: 10.1111/cge.14147. Epub 2022 May 16.
    • Patient ethnicity and cascade genetic testing: a descriptive study of a publicly funded hereditary cancer program.
    • Braley EF, Bedard AC, Nuk J, Hong Q, Bedard JEJ, Sun S, Schrader KA.
    • Fam Cancer. 2022 Jul;21(3):369-374. doi: 10.1007/s10689-021-00270-0. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
    • Patients' challenges, competencies, and perceived support in dealing with information needs - A qualitative analysis in patients with breast and gynecological cancer.
    • Fahmer N, Faller H, Engehausen D, Hass HG, Reuss-Borst M, Duelli K, Wöckel A, Heuschmann PU, Meng K.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2382-2390. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
    • Distress facing increased genetic risk of cancer: The role of social support and emotional suppression.
    • Gomes P, Matos PM, Silva ER, Silva J, Silva E, Sales CMD.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2436-2442. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
    • Validation of the multidimensional impact of Cancer Risk Assessment Questionnaire to assess impact of waiting for genome sequencing results.
    • Best M, Napier C, Schlub T, Bartley N, Biesecker B, Ballinger M, Butow P.
    • Psychooncology. 2022 Jul;31(7):1204-1211. doi: 10.1002/pon.5908. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
    • Mother and Daughter Perspectives on Genetic Counseling and Testing of Adolescents for Hereditary Breast Cancer Risk.
    • Jennings C, Wynn J, Miguel C, Levinson E, Florido ME, White M, Sands CB, Schwartz LA, Daly M, O'Toole K, Buys SS, Glendon G, Hanna D, Andrulis IL, Terry MB, Chung WK, Bradbury A.
    • J Pediatr. 2022 Jun 28:S0022-3476(22)00601-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.06.027. Epub ahead of print.

    Related:

    Commentary:

    I know things now: The challenges for genetic counseling of adolescents with a family history of hereditary breast cancer.

    • Psychological and health behaviour outcomes following multi-gene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk: a mini-review of the literature.
    • Carlsson L, Thain E, Gillies B, Metcalfe K.
    • Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Jun 22;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00229-x.
    • Stress, anxiety, and health-related quality of life in BRCA1/2-positive women with and without cancer: A comparison of four US female samples.
    • Dibble KE, Donorfio LKM, Britner PA, Bellizzi KM.
    • Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jun 20;42:101033. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101033.
    • TRACEBACK: Testing of Historical Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Patients for Hereditary Risk Genes as a Cancer Prevention Strategy in Family Members.
    • Delahunty R, Nguyen L, Craig S, Creighton B, Ariyaratne D, Garsed DW, Christie E, Fereday S, Andrews L, Lewis A, Limb S, Pandey A, Hendley J, Traficante N, Carvajal N, Spurdle AB, Thompson B, Parsons MT, Beshay V, Volcheck M, Semple T, Lupat R, Doig K, Yu J, Chen XQ, Marsh A, Love C, Bilic S, Beilin M, Nichols CB, Greer C, Lee YC, Gerty S, Gill L, Newton E, Howard J, Williams R, Norris C, Stephens AN, Tutty E, Smyth C, O'Connell S, Jobling T, Stewart CJR, Tan A, Fox SB, Pachter N, Li J, Ellul J, Mir Arnau G, Young MA, Gordon L, Forrest L, Harris M, Livingstone K, Hill J, Chenevix-Trench G, Cohen PA, Webb PM, Friedlander M, James P, Bowtell D, Alsop K; Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Ovarian Cancer Prognosis and Lifestyle Study and the TRACEBACK Study.
    • J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 20;40(18):2036-2047. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02108. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
    • Population-based BRCA1/2 testing programmes are highly acceptable in the Jewish community: results of the JeneScreen Study.
    • Tiller JM, Cousens NE, Kaur R, Rowley S, Ko YA, Mahale S, Bankier A, Meiser B, Barlow-Stewart K, Burnett L, Jacobs C, James P, Trainer A, Neil S, Campbell IG, Andrews L, Delatycki M.
    • J Med Genet. 2022 Jun 3:jmedgenet-2022-108519. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2022-108519. Epub ahead of print.
    • Helping Patients Understand and Cope with BRCA Mutations.
    • Makhnoon S, Arun B, Bedrosian I.
    • Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Jun;24(6):733-740. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01254-8. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
    • Perceptions and care Recommendations from Previvors: Qualitative analysis of female BRCA1/2 mutation Carriers' experience with genetic testing and counseling.
    • Dibble KE, Donorfio LKM, Britner PA, Bellizzi KM.
    • Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 May 2 [eCollection 2022 Jun];41:100989. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100989.
    • Psychiatric symptoms in a Spanish sample with hereditary cancer risk.
    • Costa-Requena G, Garcia-Garijo M, Richart-Aznar P, Segura-Huerta Á.
    • J Community Genet. 2022 Jun;13(3):339-346. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00580-5. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

    Related:

    Identifier: NCT04428710: Assessment Psychological Distress for Cancer Heredity Test. (ClinicalTrials.gov)

    • Assessing the acceptability, feasibility, and usefulness of a psychosocial screening tool to patients and clinicians in a clinical genetics service in Australia.
    • Monohan K, Purvis R, Sexton A, Kentwell M, Thet M, Stafford L, Forrest L.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Jun;31(3):653-662. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1532. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
    • Transgender patients' perspectives on their cancer genetic counseling experiences.
    • Rolle L, Zayhowski K, Koeller D, Chiluiza D, Carmichael N.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Jun;31(3):781-791. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1544. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
    • Ethical, legal, and sociocultural challenges of genomic research in Jordan: a mixed methods study in patients with breast cancer with Jordanian-Palestinian heritage.
    • Al-Omari A, Al-Hussaini M, Zahran F, Abdel-Razeq H.
    • Lancet. 2022 Jun;399 Suppl 1:S26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01161-8.
    • Personalised Risk Prediction in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Protocol for a Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial.
    • Archer S, Fennell N, Colvin E, Laquindanum R, Mills M, Dennis R, Stutzin Donoso F, Gold R, Fan A, Downes K, Ford J, Antoniou AC, Kurian AW, Evans DG, Tischkowitz M.
    • Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 31;14(11):2716. doi: 10.3390/cancers14112716.
    • Patient Experience with a Gynecologic Oncology-Initiated Genetic Testing Model for Women with Tubo-Ovarian Cancer.
    • Sadinsky MB, Power J, Ambrosio E, Palma L, Zeng X, Foulkes WD, Weber E.
    • Curr Oncol. 2022 May 15;29(5):3565-3575. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29050288.
    • Genetic testing is becoming more accessible — and it's raising difficult questions.
    • Shapiro A, Mehta J, Brown A.
    • NPR. 2022 May 10.

    Related:

    News, Audio: How genetic testing led a food lover to live without a stomach. (NPR)

    • Psychosocial impact of proactive rapid genetic counseling following breast cancer diagnosis.
    • Kritzik R, Usoro E, Peshkin BN, Isaacs C, Valdimarsdottir HB, Willey S, O'Neill S, DeMarco T, Nusbaum R, Jandorf L, Kelleher S, Schwartz MD.
    • Psychooncology. 2022 May;31(5):788-797. doi: 10.1002/pon.5863. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
    • Unselected Population Genetic Testing for Personalised Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction: A Qualitative Study Using Semi-Structured Interviews.
    • Gaba F, Oxley S, Liu X, Yang X, Chandrasekaran D, Kalsi J, Antoniou A, Side L, Sanderson S, Waller J, Ahmed M, Wallace A, Wallis Y, Menon U, Jacobs I, Legood R, Marks D, Manchanda R.
    • Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;12(5):1028. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051028.
    • Reflex BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumour genetic testing for high-grade serous ovarian cancer: streamlined for clinicians but what do patients think?
    • McCuaig JM, Ferguson SE, Vicus D, Ott K, Stockley TL, Kim RH, Metcalfe KA.
    • Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Apr 13;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00221-5.
    • Psychological Determinants of Men's Adherence to Cascade Screening for BRCA1/2.
    • Ongaro G, Petrocchi S, Calvello M, Bonanni B, Feroce I, Pravettoni G.
    • Curr Oncol. 2022 Apr 2;29(4):2490-2503. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29040203.
    • Outcomes of support groups for carriers of BRCA 1/2 pathogenic variants and their relatives: a systematic review.
    • Bertonazzi B, Turchetti D, Godino L.
    • Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Apr;30(4):398-405. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01044-7.
    • "I wish that there was more info": characterizing the uncertainty experienced by carriers of pathogenic ATM and/or CHEK2 variants.
    • Reyes KG, Clark C, Gerhart M, Newson AJ, Ormond KE.
    • Fam Cancer. 2022 Apr;21(2):143-155. doi: 10.1007/s10689-021-00251-3. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
    • Japanese women's reasons for accompaniment status to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer-focused genetic counseling.
    • Matsukawa M, Torishima M, Satoh C, Honda S, Kosugi S.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Apr;31(2):497-509. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1519. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
    • Assessing the relationship between patient preferences for recontact after BRCA1 or BRCA2 genetic testing and their monitoring coping style in a Norwegian sample.
    • Dahle Ommundsen RM, Strømsvik N, Hamang A.
    • J Genet Couns. 2022 Apr;31(2):554-564. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1526. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
    • Genetic testing and family entanglements.
    • Dimond R, Doheny S, Ballard L, Clarke A.
    • Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114857. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114857. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
    • Investigating men's motivations to engage in genetic screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.
    • Annoni AM, Longhini C.
    • PLoS One. 2022 Mar 18;17(3):e0265387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265387.
    • "You Always Have It in the Back of Your Mind"-Feelings, Coping, and Support Needs of Women with Pathogenic Variants in Moderate-Risk Genes for Hereditary Breast Cancer Attending Genetic Counseling in Germany: A Qualitative Interview Study.
    • Stracke C, Lemmen C, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Kautz-Freimuth S, Stock S.
    • Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;19(6):3525. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063525.
    • Cancer Anxiety Mediates the Association Between Satisfaction With Medical Communication and Psychological Quality of Life After Prophylactic Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy.
    • Zarbo C, Brugnera A, Frigerio L, Celi C, Compare A, Dessì V, Giordano R, Malandrino C, Sina FP, Strepparava MG, Tessitore IV, Ventura M, Fruscio R.
    • Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 9;13:840931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840931.
    • Transforming the 2-week wait (2WW) pathway: management of breast pain in primary care.
    • Jahan M, Bartholomeuz T, Milburn N, Rogers V, Sibbering M, Robertson J.
    • BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Mar;11(1):e001634. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001634.
    • Motivations and concerns of patients considering participation in an implementation study of a hereditary cancer risk assessment program in diverse primary care settings.
    • Duenas DM, Shipman KJ, Porter KM, Shuster E, Guerra C, Reyes A, Kauffman TL, Hunter JE, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS, Kraft SA.
    • Genet Med. 2022 Mar;24(3):610-621. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
    • Couplelinks online intervention for young couples facing breast cancer: A randomised controlled trial.
    • Fergus K, Ahmad S, Gardner S, Ianakieva I, McLeod D, Stephen J, Carter W, Periera A, Warner E, Panchaud J.
    • Psychooncology. 2022 Mar;31(3):512-520. doi: 10.1002/pon.5836. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
    • Evaluation of two evidence-based decision aids for female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in Germany: study protocol for a randomised controlled parallel-group trial.
    • Kautz-Freimuth S, Redaèlli M, Isselhard A, Shukri A, Vodermaier A, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Stock S.
    • Trials. 2022 Feb 16;23(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06081-7.
    • Psychosocial outcome and health behaviour intent of breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 and PALB2 pathogenic variants unselected by a priori risk.
    • Padmanabhan H, Hassan NT, Wong SW, Lee YQ, Lim J, Hasan SN, Yip CH, Teo SH, Thong MK, Mohd Taib NA, Yoon SY.
    • PLoS One. 2022 Feb 15;17(2):e0263675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263675.
    • Pink Ribbons.
    • Prsic E.
    • JAMA Oncol. 2022 Feb 1;8(2):207. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6413.
    • Commentary
    • Impact of rapid genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 at time of breast cancer diagnosis on psychosocial functioning.
    • Metcalfe KA, Eisen A, Wright F, Poll A, Candib A, McCready D, Cil T, Armel S, Silberman Y, Brennenstuhl S, Narod SA.
    • Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Feb;191(3):631-641. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06457-4. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
    • Information needs on breast cancer genetic and non-genetic risk factors in relatives of women with a BRCA1/2 or PALB2 pathogenic variant.
    • Brédart A, De Pauw A, Anota A, Tüchler A, Dick J, Müller A, Kop JL, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Devilee P, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Dolbeault S.
    • Breast. 2021 Dec;60:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
    • Breast cancer polygenic risk scores: a 12-month prospective study of patient reported outcomes and risk management behavior.
    • Yanes T, Meiser B, Kaur R, Young MA, Mitchell PB, Scheepers-Joynt M, McInerny S, Taylor S, Barlow-Stewart K, Antill Y, Salmon L, Smyth C, Betz-Stablein B, James PA.
    • Genet Med. 2021 Dec;23(12):2316-2323. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01288-6. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

    Related:

    Podcast: GenePod—November: The potential impact of a PRS-based breast cancer risk assessment. (Genetics in Medicine)

    • Unselected Women's Experiences of Receiving Genetic Research Results for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Qualitative Study.
    • Forbes Shepherd R, Forrest LE, Tutty E, Pearce A, Devereux L, James PA, Campbell IG, Trainer A, Young MA.
    • Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2021 Dec;25(12):741-748. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2021.0115.
    • A systematic review of psycho-social interventions for individuals with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant.
    • Warner NZ, Matthews S, Groarke A, McSharry J.
    • J Genet Couns. 2021 Dec;30(6):1695-1706. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1436. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
    • The role of psychosocial factors in Black women's self-efficacy in receiving genetic counseling and testing.
    • Ding H, Sutton AL, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Sheppard VB.
    • J Genet Couns. 2021 Dec;30(6):1719-1726. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1439. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
    • Conference Session Highlight: I'm Not White, Can I Still Have a Mutation?
    • Stallings E, Goldberg D.
    • FORCE. Blog. 2021 Nov 19.
    • Implication and Influence of Multigene Panel Testing with Genetic Counseling in Korean Patients with BRCA1/2 Mutation-Negative Breast Cancer.
    • Park JS, Shin S, Lee YJ, Lee ST, Nam EJ, Han JW, Lee SH, Kim TI, Park HS.
    • Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Nov 17. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.978. Epub ahead of print.
    • What is empathy? Oncology patient perspectives on empathic clinician behaviors.
    • Sanders JJ, Dubey M, Hall JA, Catzen HZ, Blanch-Hartigan D, Schwartz R.
    • Cancer. 2021 Nov 15;127(22):4258-4265. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33834. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
    • Telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary cancer risk: Patient predictors of differential outcomes.
    • Binion S, Sorgen LJ, Peshkin BN, Valdimarsdottir H, Isaacs C, Nusbaum R, Graves KD, DeMarco T, Wood M, McKinnon W, Garber J, McCormick S, Ladd MK, Schwartz MD.
    • J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Nov 15:1357633X211052220. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211052220. Epub ahead of print.
    • Access to Information and Support is the Key to Education for the Deaf Community.
    • Lesser D.
    • FORCE. Blog. 2021 Nov 10.
    • November: The potential impact of a PRS-based breast cancer risk assessment.
    • Yanes T, Graber C.
    • Genetics in Medicine. GenePod. 2021 Nov.

    Related:

    Original research:

    Breast cancer polygenic risk scores: a 12-month prospective study of patient reported outcomes and risk management behavior.

    • Uptake and acceptability of a mainstreaming model of hereditary cancer multigene panel testing among patients with ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer.
    • Hamilton JG, Symecko H, Spielman K, Breen K, Mueller R, Catchings A, Trottier M, Salo-Mullen EE, Shah I, Arutyunova A, Batson M, Gebert R, Pundock S, Schofield E, Offit K, Stadler ZK, Cadoo K, Carlo MI, Narayan V, Reiss KA, Robson ME, Domchek SM.
    • Genet Med. 2021 Nov;23(11):2105-2113. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01262-2. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
    • Experience and Perceptions of a Family Health History Risk Assessment Tool among Multi-Ethnic Asian Breast Cancer Patients.
    • Yoon S, Goh H, Fung SM, Tang S, Matchar D, Ginsburg GS, Orlando LA, Ngeow J, Wu RR.
    • J Pers Med. 2021 Oct 19;11(10):1046. doi: 10.3390/jpm11101046.
    • Communication processes about predictive genetic testing within high-risk breast cancer families: a two-phase study design.
    • Blomen CL, Pott A, Volk AE, Budäus L, Witzel I.
    • Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 11;11(1):20178. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98737-8.
    • Self-Transcendence of Japanese Female Breast Cancer Patients with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.
    • Aoki S, Fujita S.
    • Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct 4;8(6):670-678. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon-218.
    • A culturally targeted video to promote genetic counseling in a community sample of at-risk US Latina women: The role of the concrete mindset.
    • Carrera P, Sheppard VB, Caballero A, Gómez-Trillos S, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A.
    • J Community Psychol. 2021 Oct 4. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22718. Epub ahead of print.
    • Telehealth genetic services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implementation and patient experiences across multiple specialties in Nebraska.
    • Rezich BMZ, Malone JA, Reiser G, Zimmerman HH, Blase TL, Fishler KP.
    • J Genet Couns. 2021 Oct;30(5):1233-1243. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1507. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
    • Telehealth for genetic counseling: A systematic evidence review.
    • Danylchuk NR, Cook L, Shane-Carson KP, Cacioppo CN, Hardy MW, Nusbaum R, Steelman SC, Malinowski J.
    • J Genet Couns. 2021 Oct;30(5):1361-1378. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1481. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
    • Review
    • Exploring Implementation of Personal Breast Cancer Risk Assessments.
    • Sierra MA, Wheeler JCW, Devereux L, Trainer AH, Keogh L.
    • J Pers Med. 2021 Sep 30;11(10):992. doi: 10.3390/jpm11100992.
    • Coping response and family communication of cancer risk in men harboring a BRCA mutation: A mixed methods study.
    • Dwyer AA, Hesse-Biber S, Shea H, Zeng Z, Yi S.
    • Psychooncology. 2021 Sep 28. doi: 10.1002/pon.5831. Epub ahead of print.
    • Alternative Genetic Counseling Approach Leads to Higher Patient Satisfaction, Study Suggests.
    • Curtin C.
    • GenomeWeb. Research & Discovery. 2021 Sep 27.
    • Improving our model of cascade testing for hereditary cancer risk by leveraging patient peer support: a concept report.
    • O'Neill SC, Hamilton JG, Conley CC, Peshkin BN, Sacca R, McDonnell GA, Isaacs C, Robson ME, Tercyak KP.
    • Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2021 Sep 26;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13053-021-00198-7.
    • Building the What Comes Next Cohort for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing: a descriptive analysis.
    • Dossa F, Metcalfe K, Sutradhar R, Little T, Eisen A, Chun K, Meschino WS, Velsher L, Ellis JL, Baxter NN.
    • CMAJ Open. 2021 Sep 21;9(3):E874-E885. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200228.
    • Understanding BRCA1/2 Previvors’ Information and Support Needs: Results from a Community Needs Assessment.
    • Boumis JK, Dean M.
    • FORCE. Blog. 2021 Sep 20.
    • Feasibility of genetic testing for cancer risk assessment programme in Nigeria.
    • Adejumo PO, Aniagwu TIG, Awolude OA, Oni AO, Ajayi OO, Fagbenle O, Ogungbade D, Kochheiser M, Ogundiran T, Olopade OI.
    • Ecancermedicalscience. 2021 Sep 7;15:1283. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1283.
    • Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of a French Version of the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale (GCSS) as an Outcome Measure of Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.
    • Villafane-Bernier C, Lapointe J, Raîche C, Lauzier S, Chiquette J, Bouchard K, Pelletier S, Omeranovic A, Rhéaume J, Brousseau C, Hébert J, Dorval M, Nabi H.
    • Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Sep 2;9(9):1145. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9091145.
    • Pretest Genetic Education Video Versus Genetic Counseling for Men Considering Prostate Cancer Germline Testing: A Patient-Choice Study to Address Urgent Practice Needs.
    • Russo J, McDougall C, Bowler N, Shimada A, Gross L, Hyatt C, Kelly WK, Calvaresi A, Handley NR, Hirsch IH, Izes JK, Lallas CD, Mann M, Mark JR, Mille PJ, Preate D Jr, Trabulsi EJ, Tsang M, Chandrasekar T, Weiner PR, Gomella LG, Giri VN.
    • JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;5:PO.21.00238. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00238.

    Related:

    Research news: Men Give Thumbs Up to Video on Genetic Testing in Prostate Cancer. (Medscape Oncology)

    • Patient-Reported Outcomes following Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome, and Lynch Syndrome: A Systematic Review.
    • Hendricks-Sturrup RM, Joseph L, Lu CY.
    • J Pers Med. 2021 Aug 27;11(9):850. doi: 10.3390/jpm11090850.
    • Evaluation of a patient decision aid for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers choosing an ovarian cancer prevention strategy.
    • Steenbeek MP, van Bommel MHD, Harmsen MG, Hoogerbrugge N, van Doorn HC, Keurentjes JHM, van Beurden M, Zweemer RP, Gaarenstroom KN, Penders CGJ, Brood-van Zanten MMA, Vos MC, Piek JM, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Apperloo MJA, Coppus SFPJ, IntHout J, de Hullu JA, Hermens RPMG.
    • Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Aug 26:S0090-8258(21)01317-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.019. Epub ahead of print.
    • "Being proactive, not reactive": exploring perceptions of genetic testing among White, Latinx, and Pacific Islander Populations.
    • Chavez-Yenter D, Vagher J, Clayton MF, Rindler M, Shukovich M, Kaphingst KA.
    • J Community Genet. 2021 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00542-3. Epub ahead of print.
    • Genetic counselling as a route to enhanced autonomy: using a sequential mixed methods research approach to develop a theory regarding presymptomatic genetic testing for young adults at risk of inherited cancer syndromes.
    • Godino L, Turchetti D, Jackson L, Hennessy C, Skirton H.
    • J Community Genet. 2021 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00548-x. Epub ahead of print.
    • Genetic Testing Challenges in Oncology: Consumer Genomics Reveals More Than Fun Traits.
    • Ray T.
    • Precision Oncology News. Biomarkers. BRCA. 2021 Aug 3.
    • Benefits and limitations of telegenetics: A literature review.
    • Gorrie A, Gold J, Cameron C, Krause M, Kincaid H.
    • J Genet Couns. 2021 Aug;30(4):924-937. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1418. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
    • Review
    • COVID contingencies: Early epicenter experiences of different genetics clinics at a New York City institution inform emergency adaptation strategies.
    • Ahimaz P, Giordano J, Disco M, Harrington E, Levinson E, Spiegel E, Andrews C, Griffin E, Hernan R, Wynn J.
    • J Genet Couns. 2021 Aug;30(4):938-948. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1409. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
    • Pursuing germline genome sequencing to reduce illness uncertainty may involve additional uncertainties for cancer patients: A mixed-methods study.
    • Bartley N, Best M, Butow P.
    • J Genet Couns. 2021 Aug;30(4):1143-1155. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1398. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
    • Risk-Stratified Approach to Breast Cancer Screening in Canada: Women's Knowledge of the Legislative Context and Concerns about Discrimination from Genetic and Other Predictive Health Data.
    • Alarie S, Hagan J, Dalpé G, Faraji S, Mbuya-Bienge C, Nabi H, Pashayan N, Brooks JD, Dorval M, Chiquette J, Eloy L, Turgeon A, Lambert-Côté L, Paquette JS, Walker MJ, Lapointe J, Granados Moreno P, Blackmore K, Wolfson M, Broeders M, The Perspective I I Study Group, Knoppers BM, Chiarelli AM, Simard J, Joly Y.
    • J Pers Med. 2021 Jul 27;11(8):726. doi: 10.3390/jpm11080726.
    • How does genetic testing influence anxiety, depression, and quality of life? A hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome suspects trial.
    • Oliveira FFB, de Barros Silva PG, de Sant'Ana RO, de Albuquerque CGP, Bezerra MJB, Wong DVT, da Silveira Bitencourt F, de Lima Silva-Fernandes IJ, Lima MVA.
    • Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jul;29(7):3521-3530. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05867-2. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
    • Genetic Testing Challenges in Oncology: Inaccurate Patient Claims Complicate Cancer Risk Management.
    • Ray T.
    • Precision Oncology News. Biomarkers. BRCA. 2021 Jun 30.

    Related:

    Blog post: Genetic Testing Challenges in Oncology: Inaccurate Patient Claims Complicate Cancer Risk Management. (My Gene Counsel)

    • Framing Effects on Decision-Making for Diagnostic Genetic Testing: Results from a Randomized Trial.
    • Dwyer AA, Shen H, Zeng Z, Gregas M, Zhao M.
    • Genes (Basel). 2021 Jun 20;12(6):941. doi: 10.3390/genes12060941.
    • Ashkenazi Dads Can Pass the BRCA Mutation to Their Kids. It Turns Out I Did.
    • Hertz B.
    • Kveller. 2021 Jun 14.

    Related:

    Blog post: Surviving, and Thriving, as a Dad with a Cancer Gene Mutation. (FORCE Blog)

    • Using a Tailored Digital Health Intervention for Family Communication and Cascade Genetic Testing in Swiss and Korean Families With Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Protocol for the DIALOGUE Study.
    • Kim S, Aceti M, Baroutsou V, Bürki N, Caiata-Zufferey M, Cattaneo M, Chappuis PO, Ciorba FM, Graffeo-Galbiati R, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Jeong J, Jung MM, Kim SW, Kim J, Lim MC, Ming C, Monnerat C, Park HS, Park SH, Pedrazzani CA, Rabaglio M, Ryu JM, Saccilotto R, Wieser S, Zürrer-Härdi U, Katapodi MC.
    • JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jun 11;10(6):e26264. doi: 10.2196/26264.
    • Motivations and barriers to pursue cancer genomic testing: A systematic review.
    • Smith-Uffen M, Bartley N, Davies G, Best M.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jun;104(6):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.024. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
    • Review
    • Uncertainty following an inconclusive result from the BRCA1/2 genetic test: A review about psychological outcomes.
    • Bramanti SM, Trumello C, Lombardi L, Cavallo A, Stuppia L, Antonucci I, Babore A.
    • World J Psychiatry. 2021 May 19;11(5):189-200. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i5.189.
    • Testing a best practices risk result format to communicate genetic risks.
    • Davis KW, Roter DL, Schmidlen T, Scheinfeldt LB, Klein WMP.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):936-943. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.021. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
    • How patients deal with an ambiguous medical test: Decision-making after genetic testing.
    • Scherr CL, Ramesh S, Getachew-Smith H, Kalke K, Ramsey K, Fischhoff B, Vadaparampil ST.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):953-959. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.020. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
    • Psychological Distress and Coping Ability of Women at High Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer before Undergoing Genetic Counseling-An Exploratory Study from Germany.
    • Vajen B, Rosset M, Wallaschek H, Baumann E, Schlegelberger B.
    • Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 19;18(8):4338. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084338.
    • A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Consent for Genetic Testing Using an Oncologist- or Genetic Counselor-Mediated Model of Care.
    • McCuaig JM, Thain E, Malcolmson J, Keshavarzi S, Armel SR, Kim RH.
    • Curr Oncol. 2021 Apr 8;28(2):1459-1471. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28020138.
    • Videoconferencing to deliver genetics services: a systematic review of telegenetics in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    • Brown EG, Watts I, Beales ER, Maudhoo A, Hayward J, Sheridan E, Rafi I.
    • Genet Med. 2021 Apr 6. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01149-2. Epub ahead of print.
    • A systematic review and meta-analysis of telephone vs in-person genetic counseling in BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing.
    • Bracke X, Roberts J, McVeigh TP.
    • J Genet Couns. 2021 Apr;30(2):563-573. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1343. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
    • Meta-Analysis
    • Psychosocial Interventions for Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation: A Scoping Review.
    • Boghosian T, McCuaig JM, Carlsson L, Metcalfe KA.
    • Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;13(7):1486. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071486.
    • Incidental findings in a series of 2500 gene panel tests for a genetic predisposition to cancer: Results and Impact on patients.
    • Nambot S, Bertolone G, Sawka C, Cosset E, Goussot V, Derangère V, Boidot R, Baurand A, Robert M, Coutant C, Loustalot C, Thauvin-Robinet C, Ghiringhelli F, Lançon A, Populaire C, Damette A, Collonge-Rame MA, Meunier-Beillard N, Lejeune C, Albuisson J, Faivre L.
    • Eur J Med Genet. 2021 Mar 19:104196. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104196. Epub ahead of print.
    • Knowledge and psychosocial impact of genetic counseling and multigene panel testing among individuals with ovarian cancer.
    • Pozzar RA, Hong F, Xiong N, Stopfer JE, Nayak MM, Underhill-Blazey M.
    • Fam Cancer. 2021 Mar 10. doi: 10.1007/s10689-021-00240-6. Epub ahead of print.
    • Genetic Testing Challenges in Oncology: Forged Genetic Test Report Leads to Incorrect Management.
    • Ray T.
    • Precision Oncology News. Diagnostics. 2021 Mar 1.
    • The Knowledge and Attitude of Patients Diagnosed with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer towards Genetic Testing.
    • Shin W, Jeong G, Son Y, Seo SS, Kang S, Park SY, Lim MC.
    • Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;18(5):2312. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052312.
    • The needs of Southeast Asian BRCA mutation carriers considering risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a qualitative study.
    • Sa'at H, Lee YK, Yoon SY, Wong SW, Woo YL, Barlow-Stewart K, Mohd Taib NA.
    • Fam Cancer. 2021 Feb 19. doi: 10.1007/s10689-021-00232-6. Epub ahead of print.
    • Gene Screenings Hold Disease Clues, but Unexplained Anomalies Often Raise Fears.
    • Bennett C.
    • KHN [Kaiser Health News]. 2021 Feb 9.

    Related:

    Press: Ambiguous genetic test results can be unsettling. Worse, they can lead to needless surgeries. (Washington Post)

    Press: My Gene Counsel Quoted in Washington Post and Kaiser Health News. (My Gene Counsel)

    • Oncologist-led BRCA counselling improves access to cancer genetic testing in middle-income Asian country, with no significant impact on psychosocial outcomes.
    • Yoon SY, Wong SW, Lim J, Ahmad S, Mariapun S, Padmanabhan H, Hassan NT, Lau SY, Ch'ng GS, Haniffa M, Ong WP, Rethanavelu K, Moey LH, Keng WT, Omar J, Mohd Abas MN, Yong CM, Ramasamy V, Md Noor MR, Aliyas I, Lim MCK, Suberamaniam A, Mat Adenan NA, Ahmad ZA, Ho GF, Abdul Malik R, Subramaniam S, Khoo BP, Raja A, Chin YS, Sim WW, Teh BH, Kho SK, Ong ESE, Voon PJ, Ismail G, Lee CL, Abdullah BZ, Loo KS, Lim CS, Lee SJ, Lim KJL, Shafiee MN, Ismail F, Latiff ZA, Ismail MP, Mohamed Jamli MF, Kumarasamy S, Leong KW, Low J, Md Yusof M, Ahmad Mustafa AM, Mat Ali NH, Makanjang M, Tayib S, Cheah N, Lim BK, Fong CK, Foo YC, Mellor Abdullah M, Tan TS, Chow DSY, Ho KF, Raman R, Radzi A, Deniel A, Teoh DCY, Ang SF, Joseph JK, Ng PHO, Tho LM, Ahmad AR, Muin I, Bleiker E, George A, Thong MK, Woo YL, Teo SH.
    • J Med Genet. 2021 Feb 1:jmedgenet-2020-107416. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107416. Epub ahead of print.
    • Examining information-seeking behavior in genetic testing for cancer predisposition: A qualitative interview study.
    • Zimmermann BM, Fanderl J, Koné I, Rabaglio M, Bürki N, Shaw D, Elger B.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Feb;104(2):257-264. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.019. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
    • The impact of the number of tests presented and a provider recommendation on decisions about genetic testing for cancer risk.
    • Schwartz MLB, Klein WMP, Erby LAH, Smith CH, Roter DL.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Feb;104(2):265-275. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.020. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
    • Recontacting non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer patients for germline CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant testing: uptake and patient experiences.
    • Velthuizen ME, van der Luijt RB, de Vries BJ, Koudijs MJ, Bleiker EMA, Ausems MGEM.
    • Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2021 Jan 19;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13053-021-00166-1.
    • Implications of Multigene Panel Testing on Psychosocial Outcomes: A Comparison of Patients With Pancreatic and Breast or Ovarian Cancer.
    • Koptiuch C, Espinel WF, Kohlmann WK, Zhao J, Kaphingst KA.
    • JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Jan 19;5:PO.20.00199. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00199.
    • Challenges of Genomic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancers.
    • McAlarnen L, Stearns K, Uyar D.
    • Appl Clin Genet. 2021 Jan 14;14:1-9. doi: 10.2147/TACG.S245021.
    • Psychosocial outcomes following germline multigene panel testing in an ethnically and economically diverse cohort of patients.
    • Culver JO, Ricker CN, Bonner J, Kidd J, Sturgeon D, Hodan R, Kingham K, Lowstuter K, Chun NM, Lebensohn AP, Rowe-Teeter C, Levonian P, Partynski K, Lara-Otero K, Hong C, Morales Pichardo J, Mills MA, Brown K, Lerman C, Ladabaum U, McDonnell KJ, Ford JM, Gruber SB, Kurian AW, Idos GE.
    • Cancer. 2020 Dec 15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33357. Epub ahead of print.
    • Process evaluation of a culturally targeted video for Latinas at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
    • Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Gómez-Trillos S, Graves KD, Carrera P, Campos C, Anderson L, Gronda A, Orellana H, Peshkin BN, Schwartz MD, Cupertino P, Ostrove N, Luta G, Gonzalez N, Sheppard VB.
    • J Genet Couns. 2020 Nov 22. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1361. Epub ahead of print.
    • Previvor at 25 - The Beginning has just Begun.
    • Wilson L.
    • FORCE. Blog. 2020 Nov 10.
    • An in-depth exploration of the post-test informational needs of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers in Asia.
    • Yuen J, Fung SM, Sia CL, Venkatramani M, Shaw T, Courtney E, Li ST, Chiang J, Tan VK, Tan BK, Ngeow J.
    • Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2020 Oct 23;18:22. doi: 10.1186/s13053-020-00154-x.
    • The factors associated with distress a minimum of six months after BRCA1/2 confirmation: A systematic review.
    • Butler E, Collier S, Hevey D.
    • J Psychosoc Oncol. 2020 Oct 22:1-27. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1836109. Epub ahead of print.
    • Review
    • Genetic testing for breast cancer risk, from BRCA1/2 to a seven gene panel: an ethical analysis.
    • Gustavsson E, Galvis G, Juth N.
    • BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Oct 21;21(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00545-8.
    • Bioethics and healthcare policies. The benefit of using genetic tests of BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 in elderly patients.
    • Fonseca V, Caeiro J.
    • Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Sep 25. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3072. Epub ahead of print.
    • Commentary
    • "I think that a brief conversation from their provider can go a very long way": Patient and provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators of genetic testing after ovarian cancer.
    • Mallen AR, Conley CC, Fuzzell L, Ketcher D, Augusto BM, McIntyre M, Barton LV, Townsend MK, Fridley BL, Tworoger SS, Wenham RM, Vadaparampil ST.
    • Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep 25. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05779-1. Epub ahead of print.
    • A pilot randomized trial of an educational intervention to increase genetic counseling and genetic testing among Latina breast cancer survivors.
    • Conley CC, Castro-Figueroa EM, Moreno L, Dutil J, García JD, Burgos C, Ricker C, Kim J, Graves KD, Ashing KT, Quinn GP, Soliman H, Vadaparampil ST.
    • J Genet Couns. 2020 Sep 16. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1324. Epub ahead of print.
    • Intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information in Italian women: towards a personalised approach.
    • Di Pietro ML, Zaçe D, Orfino A, Di Raimo FR, Poscia A, de Matteis E, Turchetti D, Godino L, Beronazzi B, Franiuk M, Bruzzone C, Varesco L, Lucci-Cordisco E, Genuardi M.
    • Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Sep 14. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00723-7. Epub ahead of print.
    • Informing models of cancer genetic care in the era of multigene panel testing with patient-led recommendations.
    • Underhill-Blazey M, Blonquist T, Chittenden A, Pozzar R, Nayak M, Lansang K, Hong F, Garber J, Stopfer JE.
    • J Genet Couns. 2020 Aug 26. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1317. Epub ahead of print.
    • Using patient perspectives to inform communication training materials for health care professionals discussing BRCA mutation testing.
    • Shilling V, Catt S, Jenkins V, Fallowfield L.
    • Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05871-4. Epub ahead of print.
    • The management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers in Singapore.
    • Chiang J, Ngeow J.
    • Chin Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 17:cco-20-104. doi: 10.21037/cco-20-104. Epub ahead of print.
    • A Modern Dilemma: How Experts Grapple with Ambiguous Genetic Test Results.
    • Scherr CL, Ross Arguedas AA, Getachew-Smith H, Marshall-Fricker C, Shrestha N, Brooks K, Fischhoff B, Vadaparampil ST.
    • Med Decis Making. 2020 Jul;40(5):655-668. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20935864.
    • Web-based return of BRCA2 research results: one-year genetic counselling experience in Iceland.
    • Stefansdottir V, Thorolfsdottir E, Hognason HB, Patch C, van El C, Hentze S, Cordier C, Mendes Á, Jonsson JJ.
    • Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Jun 10. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0665-1. Epub ahead of print.
    • Studies Show Potential of Video, Online Education to Expand Cancer Risk Genetic Test Access.
    • Ray T.
    • Precision Oncology News. 2020 Jun 4.
    • Press
    • "It wasn't just for me": Motivations and implications of genetic testing for women at a low risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.
    • Gill G, Beard C, Storey K, Taylor S, Sexton A.
    • Psychooncology. 2020 Jun 4. doi: 10.1002/pon.5436. Epub ahead of print.
    • BFOR Study Uses Digital Tools to Facilitate Population BRCA Screening in Ashkenazi Jewish Community.
    • Anderson A.
    • Precision Oncology News. 2020 Jun 3.
    • Defining health-related quality of life in localized and advanced stages of breast cancer - the first step towards hereditary cancer genetic counseling.
    • Žigman T, Lukša I, Mihaljevic G, Žarkovic M, Kirac I, Vrdoljak DV, Šerman L.
    • Acta Clin Croat. 2020 Jun;59(2):209-215. doi: 10.20471/acc.2020.59.02.02.
    • Q&A: ACMG Work Group Hoping to Spark Discussion on Reporting Germline Findings From Tumor Testing.
    • Ray T.
    • Precision Oncology News. 2020 May 21.
    • News

    Related:

    Guidelines:

    Points to consider for reporting of germline variation in patients undergoing tumor testing: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

    • Women's responses and understanding of polygenic breast cancer risk information.
    • Yanes T, Kaur R, Meiser B, Scheepers-Joynt M, McInerny S, Barlow-Stewart K, Antill Y, Salmon L, Smyth C, James PA, Young MA.
    • Fam Cancer. 2020 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s10689-020-00185-2. Epub ahead of print.
    • Pediatric Reporting of Genomic Results Study (PROGRESS): A Mixed-Methods, Longitudinal, Observational Cohort Study Protocol to Explore Disclosure of Actionable Adult- And Pediatric-Onset Genomic Variants to Minors and Their Parents.
    • Savatt JM, Wagner JK, Joffe S, Rahm AK, Williams MS, Bradbury AR, Davis FD, Hergenrather J, Hu Y, Kelly MA, Kirchner HL, Meyer MN, Mozersky J, O'Dell SM, Pervola J, Seeley A, Sturm AC, Buchanan AH.
    • BMC Pediatr. 2020 May 15;20(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02070-4.
    • Population Study of Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction for Targeted Screening and Prevention.
    • Gaba F, Blyuss O, Liu X, Goyal S, Lahoti N, Chandrasekaran D, Kurzer M, Kalsi J, Sanderson S, Lanceley A, Ahmed M, Side L, Gentry-Maharaj A, Wallis Y, Wallace A, Waller J, Luccarini C, Yang X, Dennis J, Dunning A, Lee A, Antoniou AC, Legood R, Menon U, Jacobs I, Manchanda R.
    • Cancers (Basel). 2020 May 15;12(5):E1241. doi: 10.3390/cancers12051241.
    • Expectations and psychological issues before genetic counseling: analysis of distress determinant factors.
    • Ballatore Z, Bracci R, Maccaroni E, Svarca L, Bianchi F, Belvederesi L, Bruciati C, Pagliaretta S, Murrone A, Bini F, Pistelli M, Ricci G, Berardi R.
    • Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2020 Apr 29;18:10. doi: 10.1186/s13053-020-00142-1. eCollection 2020.
    • Patient perspectives on variant reclassification after cancer susceptibility testing.
    • Halverson CME, Connors LM, Wessinger BC, Clayton EW, Wiesner GL.
    • Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Apr 24:e1275. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1275. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Points to consider for reporting of germline variation in patients undergoing tumor testing: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
    • Li MM, Chao E, Esplin ED, Miller DT, Nathanson KL, Plon SE, Scheuner MT, Stewart DR; ACMG Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee.
    • Genet Med. 2020 Apr 23. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0783-8. Epub ahead of print.

    Related:

    News, Interview: Q&A: ACMG Work Group Hoping to Spark Discussion on Reporting Germline Findings From Tumor Testing. (Precision Oncology News)

    • Longitudinal outcomes with cancer multigene panel testing in previously tested BRCA1/2 negative patients.
    • Bradbury AR, Egleston BL, Patrick-Miller LJ, Rustgi N, Brandt A, Brower J, DiGiovanni L, Fetzer D, Berkelbach C, Long JM, Powers J, Stopfer JE, Domchek SM.
    • Clin Genet. 2020 Apr;97(4):601-609. doi: 10.1111/cge.13716.
    • Facilitated referral pathway for genetic testing at the time of ovarian cancer diagnosis: uptake of genetic counseling and testing and impact on patient-reported stress, anxiety and depression.
    • Frey MK, Lee SS, Gerber D, Schwartz ZP, Martineau J, Lutz K, Reese E, Dalton E, Olsen A, Girdler J, Pothuri B, Boyd L, Curtin JP, Levine DA, Blank SV.
    • Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Apr;157(1):280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
    • Genetic Testing for Cancer Predisposition Syndromes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs)
    • Cullinan N, Capra M, McVeigh TP.
    • Curr Genet Med Rep. 2020 Mar 24. doi: 10.1007/s40142-020-00187-7. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Review
    • Factors shaping at-risk individuals' decisions to undergo genetic testing for cancer in Asia.
    • Sun S, Li ST, Ngeow J.
    • Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar 20. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12981. [Epub ahead of print]
    • The impact of communicating uncertain test results in cancer genetic counseling: A systematic mixed studies review.
    • Medendorp NM, van Maarschalkerweerd PEA, Murugesu L, Daams JG, Smets EMA, Hillen MA.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Mar 19. pii: S0738-3991(20)30149-X. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.015. [Epub ahead of print]
    • DNA tests grow more vital in hereditary breast cancer treatments. They also raise unanswerable questions.
    • Richards SE.
    • Washington Post. Health & Science. 2020 Mar 15.
    • Updated Guideline Moves Genetic Testing Beyond BRCA.
    • Narozniak R.
    • OncologyLive. 2020 Mar 13;21(6).
    • News

    Related:

    Guidelines:

    Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

    • Population-based genetic testing for Women's cancer prevention.
    • Evans O, Gaba F, Manchanda R.
    • Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Mar 2. pii: S1521-6934(20)30034-1. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.007. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Experts say more women should be tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic mutations.
    • Printz C.
    • Cancer. 2020 Feb 15;126(4):693. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32723.

    Related:

    Guidelines:

    Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

    • The narrative paradox of the BRCA gene: an ethnographic study in the clinical encounters of ovarian cancer patients.
    • Therond C, Lanceley A, Gibbon S, Rahman B.
    • Anthropol Med. 2020 Feb 3:1-16. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2019.1663784. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Oncology Clinic-Based Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing in a Population-Based Health Care System.
    • Richardson M, Min HJ, Hong Q, Compton K, Mung SW, Lohn Z, Nuk J, McCullum M, Portigal-Todd C, Karsan A, Regier D, Brotto LA, Sun S, Schrader KA.
    • Cancers (Basel). 2020 Feb 3;12(2). pii: E338. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020338.
    • Evaluating empowerment in genetic counseling using patient-reported outcomes.
    • Yuen J, Lee SY, Courtney E, Lim J, Soh H, Li ST, Chen Y, McAllister M, Fenwick EK, Ngeow J.
    • Clin Genet. 2020 Feb;97(2):246-256. doi: 10.1111/cge.13646. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
    • Italian Men Tested for BRCA1/2 Mutation: Psychological Distress during 6-Month Follow-Up.
    • Pellini F, Mirandola S, Granuzzo E, Urbani S, Piccinni Leopardi G, Pollini GP.
    • J Oncol. 2020 Jan 31;2020:3987935. doi: 10.1155/2020/3987935. eCollection 2020.
    • Genetic cancer risk assessment: A screenshot of the psychosocial profile of women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.
    • Campacci N, de Campos Reis Galvão H, Garcia LF, Ribeiro PC, Grasel RS, Goldim JR, Ashton-Prolla P, Palmero EI.
    • Psychooncology. 2020 Jan 26. doi: 10.1002/pon.5305. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Prospective Feasibility Trial of a Novel Strategy of Facilitated Cascade Genetic Testing Using Telephone Counseling.
    • Frey MK, Kahn RM, Chapman-Davis E, Tubito F, Pires , Christos P, Anderson S, Mukherjee S, Jordan B, Blank , Caputo TA, Sharaf , Offit K, Holcomb K, Lipkin S.
    • J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 10:JCO1902005. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02005. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Exploring relatives' perceptions of participation, ethics, and communication in a patient-driven study for hereditary cancer variant reclassification.
    • Tsai GJ, Chen AT, Garrett LT, Burke W, Bowen DJ, Shirts BH.
    • J Genet Couns. 2020 Jan 9. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1215. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Mental Illness and BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing Intention Among Multiethnic Women Undergoing Screening Mammography.
    • Jones T, Freeman K, Ackerman M, Trivedi MS, Silverman T, Shapiro P, Kukafka R, Crew KD.
    • Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020 Jan 1;47(1):E13-E24. doi: 10.1188/20.ONF.E13-E24.
    • Black Women's Confidence in the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.
    • Sutton AL, Henderson A, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Tanner E, Khan M, Quillin J, Sheppard VB.
    • Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 14;16(24). pii: E5112. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245112.
    • How to facilitate psychosocial adjustment in women tested for hereditary breast or ovarian cancer susceptibility? Insights from network analysis.
    • Brédart A, Dick J, Cano A, Robieux L, De Pauw A, Schmutzler R, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Dolbeault S, Kop JL.
    • Psychooncology. 2019 Dec 11. doi: 10.1002/pon.5302. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Patients with pathogenic variants for breast cancer other than BRCA1 and BRCA2: qualitative interviews about health care experiences.
    • Clift KE, Macklin SK, Hines SL.
    • Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2019 Dec 16;17:32. doi: 10.1186/s13053-019-0132-6. eCollection 2019.
    • Culturally Targeted Video Improves Psychosocial Outcomes in Latina Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.
    • Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Graves KD, Gómez-Trillos S, Carrera P, Campos C, Anderson L, Luta G, Peshkin BN, Schwartz MD, Cupertino AP, Gonzalez N, Sheppard VB.
    • Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 29;16(23). pii: E4793. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234793.
    • Mainstreamed genetic testing in ovarian cancer: patient experience of the testing process.
    • McLeavy L, Rahman B, Kristeleit R, Ledermann J, Lockley M, McCormack M, Mould T, Side L, Lanceley A.
    • Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Nov 19. pii: ijgc-2019-000630. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000630. [Epub ahead of print]
    • The "Psychosocial Aspects in Hereditary Cancer" questionnaire in women attending breast cancer genetic clinics: Psychometric validation across French-, German- and Spanish-language versions.
    • Brédart A, Anota A, Dick J, Cano A, De Pauw A, Kop JL, Aaronson NK, Bleiker EM, Brunet J, Devilee P, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Schmutzler R, Dolbeault S.
    • Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Sep 30:e13173. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13173. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Patients' willingness to reconsider cancer genetic testing after initially declining: Mention it again.
    • Halverson CME, Wessinger BC, Clayton EW, Wiesner GL.
    • J Genet Couns. 2019 Sep 25. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1174. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Psychosocial problems in women attending French, German and Spanish genetics clinics before and after targeted or multigene testing results: an observational prospective study.
    • Brédart A, Kop JL, Dick J, Cano A, De Pauw A, Anota A, Brunet J, Devilee P, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Schmutzler R, Dolbeault S.
    • BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):e029926. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029926.
    • Randomised trial of population-based BRCA testing in Ashkenazi Jews: long-term outcomes.
    • Manchanda R, Burnell M, Gaba F, Desai R, Wardle J, Gessler S, Side L, Sanderson S, Loggenberg K, Brady AF, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Chapman C, Jacobs C, Legood R, Beller U, Tomlinson I, Menon U, Jacobs I.
    • BJOG. 2019 Sep 10. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15905. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Understanding Medical Mistrust in Black Women at Risk of BRCA 1/2 Mutations.
    • Sutton AL, He J, Tanner E, Edmonds MC, Henderson A, Hurtado de Mendoza A, Sheppard VB.
    • J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2019 Fall;12(3):35-47.
    • Risk Estimation, Anxiety and Breast Cancer Worry in Women at Risk for Breast Cancer: A Single-Arm Trial of Personalized Risk Communication.
    • Xie Z, Wenger N, Stanton A, Sepucha K, Kaplan C, Madlensky L, Elashoff D, Trent J, Petruse A, Johansen L, Layton T, Naeim A.
    • Psychooncology. 2019 Aug 28. doi: 10.1002/pon.5211. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
    • US Preventive Services Task Force, Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Doubeni CA, Epling JW Jr, Kubik M, Landefeld CS, Mangione CM, Pbert L, Silverstein M, Simon MA, Tseng CW, Wong JB.
    • JAMA. 2019 Aug 20;322(7):652-665. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10987.

    Related:

    Evidence report, Review:

    Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

    Guidelines [Internet]:

    Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA1/2-Related Cancer in Women: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].

    Editorial:

    Broadening Criteria for BRCA1/2 Evaluation: Placing the USPSTF Recommendation in Context.

    Editorial:

    USPSTF Recommendations for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing in the Context of a Transformative National Cancer Control Plan.

    Editorial:

    Hereditary Cancer Evaluation in 2019-a Rapidly Evolving Landscape.

    Editorial:

    US Preventive Services Task Force Breast Cancer Recommendation Statement on Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer.

    News:

    USPSTF Calls for More BRCA Screening.

    Patient Page:

    Should I Be Tested for BRCA Mutations?

    Audio Interview, CME Activity: USPSTF Recommendation: Assessment, Counseling, and Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer. (JAMA)

    Press: USPSTF Recommendations on BRCA Mutation Testing. (Medscape Oncology)

    • Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    • Nelson HD, Pappas M, Cantor A, Haney E, Holmes R.
    • JAMA. 2019 Aug 20;322(7):666-685. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8430.

    Related:

    Guidelines:

    Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

    Guidelines:

    Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA1/2-Related Cancer in Women: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].

    • Should I Be Tested for BRCA Mutations?
    • Jin J.
    • JAMA. 2019 Aug 20;322(7):702. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11251.

    Related:

    Guidelines:

    Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

    • USPSTF Recommendation: Assessment, Counseling, and Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer.
    • Mangione CM.
    • JAMA. 2019 Aug 20.

    Related:

    Guidelines:

    Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

    • Effect of interventions including provision of personalised cancer risk information on accuracy of risk perception and psychological responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    • Bayne M, Fairey M, Silarova B, Griffin SJ, Sharp SJ, Klein WMP, Sutton S, Usher-Smith JA.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Aug 11. pii: S0738-3991(19)30350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.010. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA1/2-Related Cancer in Women: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].
    • Nelson HD, Pappas M, Cantor A, Haney E, Holmes R, Stillman L.
    • Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2019 Aug. Report No.: 19-05251-EF-1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses, formerly Systematic Evidence Reviews.

    Related:

    Guidelines:

    Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

    Guidelines:

    Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

    • MAGENTA (Making Genetic testing accessible): a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing online genetic education and telephone genetic counseling for hereditary cancer genetic testing.
    • Rayes N, Bowen DJ, Coffin T, Nebgen D, Peterson C, Munsell MF, Gavin K, Lechner R, Crase J, Polinsky D, Romero I, Blank SV, Levine DA, Norquist BM, Swisher EM, Lu KH.
    • BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 2;19(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5868-x.
    • Psychological aspects, risk and protective factors related to BRCA genetic testing: a review of the literature.
    • Lombardi L, Bramanti SM, Babore A, Stuppia L, Trumello C, Antonucci I, Cavallo A.
    • Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jun 15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04918-7. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Review
    • A Simple Way to Make Genetic Counseling More Efficient and Accessible.
    • Markman M.
    • Medscape Oncology. 2019 Jun 14.

    Related:

    Original research:

    Modified panel-based genetic counseling for ovarian cancer susceptibility: A randomized non-inferiority study.

    • Genetic counseling of patients with ovarian carcinoma: acceptance, timing, and psychological wellbeing.
    • Van de Beek I, Smets EMA, Legdeur MA, de Hullu JA, Lok CAR, Buist MR, Mourits MJE, Kets CM, van der Kolk LE, Oosterwijk JC, Aalfs CM.
    • J Community Genet. 2019 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00427-6. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Effectiveness of interventions to identify and manage patients with familial cancer risk in primary care: a systematic review.
    • Lee SI, Patel M, Dutton B, Weng S, Luveta J, Qureshi N.
    • J Community Genet. 2019 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00419-6. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Review
    • A qualitative study on decision-making about BRCA1/2 testing in Italian women.
    • Battistuzzi L, Franiuk M, Kasparian N, Rania N, Migliorini L, Varesco L.
    • Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May 5:e13083. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13083. [Epub ahead of print]
    • A narrative overview of the patients' outcomes after multigene cancer panel testing, and a thorough evaluation of its implications for genetic counselling.
    • Esteban I, Lopez-Fernandez A, Balmaña J.
    • Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):342-349. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.027. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
    • Review
    • A randomized controlled intervention to promote readiness to genetic counseling for breast cancer survivors.
    • Kasting ML, Conley CC, Hoogland AI, Scherr CL, Kim J, Thapa R, Reblin M, Meade CD, Lee MC, Pal T, Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST.
    • Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):980-988. doi: 10.1002/pon.5059. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
    • Women's perceptions of personalized risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: An international focus group study.
    • Rainey L, Jervaeus A, Donnelly LS, Evans DG, Hammarström M, Hall P, Wengström Y, Broeders MJM, van der Waal D.
    • Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):1056-1062. doi: 10.1002/pon.5051. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
    • Family communication and patient distress after germline genetic testing in individuals with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
    • Peters MLB, Stobie L, Dudley B, Karloski E, Allen K, Speare V, Dolinsky JS, Tian Y, DeLeonardis K, Krejdovsky J, Button A, Lim C, Borazanci E, Brand R, Tung N.
    • Cancer. 2019 Apr 12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32077. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Evaluation of telephone genetic counselling to facilitate germline BRCA1/2 testing in women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
    • Tutty E, Petelin L, McKinley J, Young MA, Meiser B, Rasmussen VM, Forbes Shepherd R, James PA, Forrest LE.
    • Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Apr 8. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0390-9. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Racial/Ethnic Disparities in BRCA Counseling and Testing: a Narrative Review.
    • Williams CD, Bullard AJ, O'Leary M, Thomas R, Redding TS 4th, Goldstein K.
    • J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Apr 8. doi: 10.1007/s40615-018-00556-7. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Review
    • Expectations versus reality: The impact of men's expectancy violations in conversations with healthcare providers about BRCA-related cancer risks.
    • Dean M, Rauscher E, Gomez E, Fischer C.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Apr 6. pii: S0738-3991(19)30135-1. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.010. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Rapid reversal of clinical down-classification of a BRCA1 splicing variant avoiding psychological harm.
    • Smith MJ, Woodward ER, Burghel GJ, Banks C, Morgan RD, Wallace AJ, Turnbull C, Evans DG.
    • Clin Genet. 2019 Apr;95(4):532-533. doi: 10.1111/cge.13488. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
    • Letter
    • Modified panel-based genetic counseling for ovarian cancer susceptibility: A randomized non-inferiority study.
    • McCuaig JM, Tone AA, Maganti M, Romagnuolo T, Ricker N, Shuldiner J, Rodin G, Stockley T, Kim RH, Bernardini MQ.
    • Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.12.027. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

    Related:

    Commentary: A Simple Way to Make Genetic Counseling More Efficient and Accessible. (Medscape Oncology)

    • High-risk women's risk perception after receiving personalized polygenic breast cancer risk information.
    • Forrest LE, Sawyer SD, Hallowell N, James PA, Young MA.
    • J Community Genet. 2019 Apr;10(2):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0378-0. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
    • Uncertainty related to multigene panel testing for cancer: a qualitative study on counsellors' and counselees' views.
    • Medendorp NM, Hillen MA, Murugesu L, Aalfs CM, Stiggelbout AM, Smets EMA.
    • J Community Genet. 2019 Apr;10(2):303-312. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0393-1. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
    • Experiences and interpretations of BRCA1/2 testing among women affected by breast or ovarian cancer who received a negative result.
    • Stafford L, Flehr A, Judd F, Lindeman GJ, Gibson P, Komiti A, Mann GB, Kentwell M.
    • J Community Genet. 2019 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00415-w. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Evaluation of the template letter regarding the disclosure of genetic information within the family in France.
    • Zordan C, Monteil L, Haquet E, Cordier C, Toussaint E, Roche P, Dorian V, Maillard A, Lhomme E, Richert L, Pasquier L, Akloul L, Taris N, Lacombe D.
    • J Community Genet. 2019 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00418-7. [Epub ahead of print]
    • BRCA mutation testing for ovarian cancer in the context of available targeted therapy: Survey and consensus of Hong Kong specialists.
    • Kwong A, Cheng KD, Hsue CV, Hui SK, Leung CR, Leung KA, Ngan KR, Soong SI.
    • Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;15 Suppl 2:20-31. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13116. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
    • Mainstreamed genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer: first-year experience.
    • Rahman B, Lanceley A, Kristeleit RS, Ledermann JA, Lockley M, McCormack M, Mould T, Side L.
    • J Med Genet. 2019 Mar;56(3):195-198. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-105140. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
    • Psychosocial, attitudinal, and demographic correlates of cancer-related germline genetic testing in the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey.
    • Roberts MC, Turbitt E, Klein WMP.
    • J Community Genet. 2019 Feb 20. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-00405-4. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Cancer-related distress in unselected women with newly diagnosed breast or ovarian cancer undergoing BRCA1/2 testing without pretest genetic counseling.
    • Høberg-Vetti H, Eide GE, Siglen E, Listøl W, Haavind MT, Hoogerbrugge N, Bjorvatn C.
    • Acta Oncol. 2019 Feb;58(2):175-181. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1502466. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
    • Preferences for in-person disclosure: Patients declining telephone disclosure characteristics and outcomes in the multicenter Communication Of GENetic Test Results by Telephone study.
    • Beri N, Patrick-Miller LJ, Egleston BL, Hall MJ, Domchek SM, Daly MB, Ganschow P, Grana G, Olopade OI, Fetzer D, Brandt A, Chambers R, Clark DF, Forman A, Gaber R, Gulden C, Horte J, Long J, Lucas T, Madaan S, Mattie K, McKenna D, Montgomery S, Nielsen S, Powers J, Rainey K, Rybak C, Savage M, Seelaus C, Stoll J, Stopfer JE, Yao XS, Bradbury AR.
    • Clin Genet. 2019 Feb;95(2):293-301. doi: 10.1111/cge.13474. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
    • Psychosocial and behavioral outcomes of genomic testing in cancer: a systematic review.
    • Yanes T, Willis AM, Meiser B, Tucker KM, Best M.
    • Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan;27(1):28-35. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0257-5. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
    • Review
    • Cancer communication research in the era of genomics and precision medicine: a scoping review.
    • Kaphingst KA, Peterson E, Zhao J, Gaysynsky A, Elrick A, Hong SJ, Krakow M, Pokharel M, Ratcliff CL, Klein WMP, Khoury MJ, Chou WS.
    • Genet Med. 2018 Dec 21. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0402-0. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Review
    • Use and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Clinical Multigene Panel Testing for Cancer Susceptibility in the Multicenter Communication of Genetic Test Results by Telephone Study.
    • Hall MJ, Patrick-Miller LJ, Egleston BL, Domchek SM, Daly MB, Ganschow P, Grana G, Olopade OI, Fetzer D, Brandt A, Chambers R, Clark DF, Forman A, Gaber R, Gulden C, Horte J, Long JM, Lucas T, Madaan S, Mattie K, McKenna D, Montgomery S, Nielsen S, Powers J, Rainey K, Rybak C, Savage M, Seelaus C, Stoll J, Stopfer JE, Yao XS, Bradbury AR.
    • JCO Precis Oncol. 2018;2. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00199. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
    • A Systematic Review of the Psychological Implications of Genetic Testing: A Comparative Analysis Among Cardiovascular, Neurodegenerative and Cancer Diseases.
    • Oliveri S, Ferrari F, Manfrinati A, Pravettoni G.
    • Front Genet. 2018 Dec 10;9:624. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00624.
    • Review
    • "I Am Uncertain About What My Uncertainty Even Is": Men's Uncertainty and Information Management of Their BRCA-Related Cancer Risks.
    • Rauscher EA, Dean M, Campbell-Salome GM.
    • J Genet Couns. 2018 Dec;27(6):1417-1427. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0276-y. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
    • Psychosocial impact of BRCA testing in young Black breast cancer survivors.
    • Gonzalez BD, Hoogland AI, Kasting ML, Cragun D, Kim J, Ashing K, Holt CL, Hughes Halbert C, Pal T, Vadaparampil ST.
    • Psychooncology. 2018 Dec;27(12):2778-2785. doi: 10.1002/pon.4887. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
    • A narrative overview of the patients’ outcomes after multigene cancer panel testing: Thorough evaluation of its implications for genetic counselling.
    • Estebana I, Lopez-Fernandez A, Balmaña J.
    • Eur J Med Genet. 2018 Nov 23. pii: S1769-7212(18)30422-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.027. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Review, Comment
    • The iPrevent Online Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk Management Tool: Usability and Acceptability Testing.
    • Lo LL, Collins IM, Bressel M, Butow P, Emery J, Keogh L, Weideman P, Steel E, Hopper JL, Trainer AH, Mann GB, Bickerstaffe A, Antoniou AC, Cuzick J, Phillips KA.
    • JMIR Form Res. 2018 Nov 7;2(2):e24. doi: 10.2196/formative.9935.
    • Association of Germline Genetic Test Type and Results With Patient Cancer Worry After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.
    • Katz SJ, Ward KC, Hamilton AS, Abrahamse P, Hawley ST, Kurian AW.
    • JCO Precis Oncol. 2018 Nov;2018. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00225. Epub 2018 Dec 19.

    Related:

    Research news: Genetic testing does not cause undue worry for breast cancer patients. (Rogel Cancer Center. Michigan Medicine)

    Press: Multi-Gene Panel Breast Cancer Tests Don't Faze Women. (Medscape Oncology)

    • Ethical Implications of Direct-to-Consumer Hereditary Cancer Tests.
    • Kilbride MK, Domchek SM, Bradbury AR.
    • JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1327-1328. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2439.
    • Editorial
    • Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone vs In-Person Disclosure of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results.
    • Bradbury AR, Patrick-Miller LJ, Egleston BL, Hall MJ, Domchek SM, Daly MB, Ganschow P, Grana G, Olopade OI, Fetzer D, Brandt A, Chambers R, Clark DF, Forman A, Gaber R, Gulden C, Horte J, Long JM, Lucas T, Madaan S, Mattie K, McKenna D, Montgomery S, Nielsen S, Powers J, Rainey K, Rybak C, Savage M, Seelaus C, Stoll J, Stopfer JE, Yao XS.
    • J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Sep 1;110(9):985-993. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy015.
    • The Pink Underside: The Commercialization of Medical Risk Assessment and Decision-Making Tools for Hereditary Breast Cancer Risk.
    • Hesse-Biber S, Flynn B, Farrelly K.
    • Qual Health Res. 2018 Aug;28(10):1523-1538. doi: 10.1177/1049732318767395. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
    • Coping Mechanisms, Psychological Distress, and Quality of Life Prior to Cancer Genetic Counseling.
    • Di Mattei VE, Carnelli L, Bernardi M, Bienati R, Brombin C, Cugnata F, Rabaiotti E, Zambetti M, Sarno L, Candiani M, Gentilini O.
    • Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 16;9:1218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01218. eCollection 2018.
    • The Cancer Worry Scale Revised for Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling.
    • Caruso A, Vigna C, Gremigni P.
    • Cancer Nurs. 2018 Jul/Aug;41(4):311-319. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000511.
    • Psychological outcomes and surgical decisions after genetic testing in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer with and without a family history.
    • Meiser B, Quinn VF, Mitchell G, Tucker K, Watts KJ, Rahman B, Peate M, Saunders C, Geelhoed E, Gleeson M, Barlow-Stewart K, Field M, Harris M, Antill YC, Susman R, Bowen MT, Mills L, Kirk J; TFGT Collaborative Group.
    • Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Jul;26(7):972-983. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0057-3. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
    • Making Sense of SNPs: Women's Understanding and Experiences of Receiving a Personalized Profile of Their Breast Cancer Risks.
    • Young MA, Forrest LE, Rasmussen VM, James P, Mitchell G, Sawyer SD, Reeve K, Hallowell N.
    • J Genet Couns. 2018 Jun;27(3):702-708. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0162-z. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
    • Patients' Views of Treatment-Focused Genetic Testing (TFGT): Some Lessons for the Mainstreaming of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing.
    • Wright S, Porteous M, Stirling D, Lawton J, Young O, Gourley C, Hallowell N.
    • J Genet Couns. 2018 May 11. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0261-5. [Epub ahead of print]
    • Investigating barriers to genetic counseling and germline mutation testing in women with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and Lynch syndrome.
    • Shaw J, Bulsara C, Cohen PA, Gryta M, Nichols CB, Schofield L, O'Sullivan S, Pachter N, Hardcastle SJ.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2018 May;101(5):938-944. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.12.011. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
    • Returning Individual Genetic Research Results to Research Participants: Uptake and Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer.
    • Bradbury AR, Patrick-Miller L, Egleston BL, Maxwell KN, DiGiovanni L, Brower J, Fetzer D, Bennett Gaieski J, Brandt A, McKenna D, Long J, Powers J, Stopfer JE, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM.
    • JCO Precis Oncol. 2018;2. doi: 10.1200/po.17.00250. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
    • Patient experience and utility of genetic information: a cross-sectional study among patients tested for cancer susceptibility and thrombophilia.
    • D'Andrea E, Lagerberg T, De Vito C, Pitini E, Marzuillo C, Massimi A, Vacchio MR, Grammatico P, Villari P.
    • Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Apr;26(4):518-526. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0083-1. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
    • The Right Not to Know: When Ignorance Is Bliss but Deadly.
    • Clausen AM.
    • Global Health NOW. 2018 Mar 20.

    Related:

    Commentary: The right not to know when not knowing is dangerous. (FORCE. XRAYS.)

    • Impact of a genetic counseling requirement prior to genetic testing.
    • Stenehjem DD, Au T, Sainski AM, Bauer H, Brown K, Lancaster J, Stevens V, Brixner DI.
    • BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 7;18(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2957-5.
    • Examination of the Patient-Focused Impact of Cancer Telegenetics Among a Rural Population: Comparison with Traditional In-Person Services.
    • Solomons NM, Lamb AE, Lucas FL, McDonald EF, Miesfeldt S.
    • Telemed J E Health. 2018 Feb;24(2):130-138. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0073. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
    • Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: A landscape analysis of reviews.
    • Peterson EB, Chou WS, Gaysynsky A, Krakow M, Elrick A, Khoury MJ, Kaphingst KA.
    • Transl Behav Med. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):59-70. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx063.
    • Comparing Outcomes of Genetic Counseling Options in Breast and Ovarian Cancer: An Integrative Review.
    • Fournier DM, Bazzell AF, Dains JE.
    • Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018 Jan 1;45(1):96-105. doi: 10.1188/18.ONF.96-105.
    • Review
    • Quality-of-life implications of risk-reducing cancer surgery.
    • Altman AM, Hui JYC, Tuttle TM.
    • Br J Surg. 2018 Jan;105(2):e121-e130. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10725.
    • Genetic Testing in a Population-Based Sample of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Survivors from the REACH Randomized Trial: Cost Barriers and Moderators of Counseling Mode.
    • Steffen LE, Du R, Gammon A, Mandelblatt JS, Kohlmann WK, Lee JH, Buys SS, Stroup AM, Campo RA, Flores KG, Vicuña B, Schwartz MD, Kinney AY.
    • Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Dec;26(12):1772-1780. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0389. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
    • Universal BRCA1/BRCA2 Testing for Ovarian Cancer Patients is Welcomed, but with Care: How Women and Staff Contextualize Experiences of Expanded Access.
    • Shipman H, Flynn S, MacDonald-Smith CF, Brenton J, Crawford R, Tischkowitz M; GTEOC Study Group, Hulbert-Williams NJ.
    • J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1280-1291. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0108-5. Epub 2017 May 24.
    • Genetics of Breast and Gynecologic Cancers (PDQ®): Health Professional Version. Psychosocial Issues in Inherited Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndromes. What People Bring to Genetic Testing: Impact of Risk Perception, Health Beliefs, and Personality Characteristics.
    • PDQ Cancer Genetics Editorial Board.
    • PDQ Cancer Information Summaries [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Updated 2017 Nov 30. Accessed 2017 Dec 8.
    • Genetics of Breast and Gynecologic Cancers (PDQ®): Health Professional Version. Psychosocial Issues in Inherited Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndromes. Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Predisposition to Breast Cancer.
    • PDQ Cancer Genetics Editorial Board.
    • PDQ Cancer Information Summaries [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Updated 2017 Nov 30. Accessed 2017 Dec 8.
    • Genetic counseling by phone or face-to-face.
    • [No author given]
    • FORCE. XRAYS. 2017 Nov 29.
    • Emotional impact on the results of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test: an observational retrospective study.
    • Mella S, Muzzatti B, Dolcetti R, Annunziata MA.
    • Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2017 Oct 2;15:16. doi: 10.1186/s13053-017-0077-6. eCollection 2017.
    • Risk Perception and Psychological Distress in Genetic Counselling for Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer.
    • Cicero G, De Luca R, Dorangricchia P, Lo Coco G, Guarnaccia C, Fanale D, Calò V, Russo A.
    • J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct;26(5):999-1007. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0072-0. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
    • Impact of Panel Gene Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer on Patients.
    • Lumish HS, Steinfeld H, Koval C, Russo D, Levinson E, Wynn J, Duong J, Chung WK.
    • J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct;26(5):1116-1129. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0090-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

    Related:

    Letter:

    Anxiety and Hereditary Testing Results.

    Letter, Reply:

    Response to Dr. Sorscher.

    • Anxiety and Hereditary Testing Results.
    • Sorscher S.
    • J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct;26(5):1162–1163. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0109-4. Epub 2017 May 24.
    • Letter

    Related:

    Impact of Panel Gene Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer on Patients.

    Letter, Reply:

    Response to Dr. Sorscher.

    • Evaluation of psychosocial aspects in participants of cancer genetic counseling.
    • González-Ramírez LP, Martínez-Arriaga R, Camacho-Cárdenas E, Del Toro-Valero A, Oceguera-Villanueva A, Zagamé L, Silva-García AA, Daneri-Navarro A.
    • Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2017 Sep 20;15:13. doi: 10.1186/s13053-017-0073-x. eCollection 2017.
    • The Impact of Mental Illness on Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast Cancer and Ovarian Cancer in a Multiethnic Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.
    • Ackerman MG, Shapiro PA, Coe A, Trivedi MS, Crew KD.
    • Breast J. 2017 Sep;23(5):519-524. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12791. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
    • Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone vs In-Person Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A 12-Month Follow-Up.
    • Interrante MK, Segal H, Peshkin BN, Valdimarsdottir HB, Nusbaum R, Similuk M, DeMarco T, Hooker G, Graves K, Isaacs C, Wood M, McKinnon W, Garber J, McCormick S, Heinzmann J, Kinney AY, Schwartz MD.
    • JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2017 Sep;1(1):pkx002. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkx002. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
    • The power of shared experience: Empowering women to face their cancer risk.
    • Caitlin Lopez
    • NSGC blog, 2017 Aug 30.
    • Psychosocial and behavioral impact of breast cancer risk assessed by testing for common risk variants: protocol of a prospective study.
    • Yanes T, Meiser B, Young MA, Kaur R, Mitchell G, Barlow-Stewart K, Roscioli T, Halliday J, James P.
    • BMC Cancer. 2017 Jul 18;17(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3485-0.
    • Population screening for BRCA1/BRCA2 founder mutations in Ashkenazi Jews: proactive recruitment compared with self-referral.
    • Lieberman S, Tomer A, Ben-Chetrit A, Olsha O, Strano S, Beeri R, Koka S, Fridman H, Djemal K, Glick I, Zalut T, Segev S, Sklair M, Kaufman B, Lahad A, Raz A, Levy-Lahad E.
    • Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):754-762. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.182. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
    • Online self-test identifies women at high familial breast cancer risk in population-based breast cancer screening without inducing anxiety or distress.
    • van Erkelens A, Sie AS, Manders P, Visser A, Duijm LE, Mann RM, Ten Voorde M, Kroeze H, Prins JB, Hoogerbrugge N.
    • Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jun;78:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
    • "I Don't Want to Be an Ostrich": Managing Mothers' Uncertainty during BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling.
    • Fisher CL, Roccotagliata T, Rising CJ, Kissane DW, Glogowski EA, Bylund CL.
    • J Genet Couns. 2017 Jun;26(3):455-468. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9998-x. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
    • Deficit of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomies in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers After Telephone Genetic Counseling.
    • Benusiglio PR, Caron O.
    • J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 10;35(11):1255. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.5780. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

    Related:

    Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.

    • Effect on perceived control and psychological distress of genetic knowledge in women with breast cancer receiving a BRCA1/2 test result.
    • Brédart A, Kop JL, De Pauw A, Caron O, Fajac A, Noguès C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Dolbeault S.
    • Breast. 2017 Feb;31:121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.024. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
    • Identifying Needs: a Qualitative Study of women's Experiences Regarding Rapid Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the DNA BONus Study.
    • Augestad MT, Høberg-Vetti H, Bjorvatn C, Sekse RJ
    • J Genet Couns. 2017 Feb;26(1):182-189. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9996-z. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
    • Experience of Social Media Support Group for BRCA Carriers.
    • Stefansdottir V.
    • J Genet Couns. 2016 Dec;25(6):1342-1344. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
    • Letter
    • Long-term experiences with genetic consultation in people with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
    • Eismann S, Vetter L, Keller M, Bruckner T, Golatta M, Hennings A, Domschke C, Dikow N, Sohn C, Heil J, Schott S.
    • Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Nov;294(5):1011-1018. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
    • Disclosure of research results: a randomized study on GENEPSO-PS cohort participants.
    • Mancini J, Le Cozannet E, Bouhnik AD, Resseguier N, Lasset C, Mouret-Fourme E, Noguès C, Julian-Reynier C.
    • Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1023-35. doi: 10.1111/hex.12390. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
    • Psychological Distress, Anxiety, and Depression of Cancer-Affected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: a Systematic Review.
    • Ringwald J, Wochnowski C, Bosse K, Giel KE, Schäffeler N, Zipfel S, Teufel M.
    • J Genet Couns. 2016 Oct;25(5):880-891. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
    • Review
    • New paradigms for BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in women with ovarian cancer: results of the Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (GTEOC) study.
    • Plaskocinska I, Shipman H, Drummond J, Thompson E, Buchanan V, Newcombe B, Hodgkin C, Barter E, Ridley P, Ng R, Miller S, Dann A, Licence V, Webb H, Tan LT, Daly M, Ayers S, Rufford B, Earl H, Parkinson C, Duncan T, Jimenez-Linan M, Sagoo GS, Abbs S, Hulbert-Williams N, Pharoah P, Crawford R, Brenton JD, Tischkowitz M.
    • J Med Genet. 2016 Oct;53(10):655-61. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-103902. Epub 2016 May 12.
    • Psychosocial outcomes and counselee satisfaction following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: A patient-reported outcome study.
    • Oberguggenberger A, Sztankay M, Morscher RJ, Sperner-Unterweger B, Weber I, Hubalek M, Kemmler G, Zschocke J, Martini C, Egle D, Dünser M, Gamper E, Meraner V.
    • J Psychosom Res. 2016 Oct;89:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
    • Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.
    • Kinney AY, Steffen LE, Brumbach BH, Kohlmann W, Du R, Lee JH, Gammon A, Butler K, Buys SS, Stroup AM, Campo RA, Flores KG, Mandelblatt JS, Schwartz MD.
    • J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 20;34(24):2914-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9557. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

    Related:

    Letter:

    Deficit of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomies in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers After Telephone Genetic Counseling.

    Press: Telephone counseling can help make cancer genetic services more accessible to rural women (News Medical)

    • Multigene Panel Tests Yield Clues to Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk.
    • Greg Kennelty.
    • Oncology Nursing News. 2016 Aug 3.
    • Quality of Life and Psychological State in Chinese Breast Cancer Patients Who Received BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing.
    • Qiu J, Guan J, Yang X, Wu J, Liu G, Di G, Chen C, Hou Y, Han Q, Shen Z, Shao Z, Hu Z.
    • PLoS One. 2016 Jul 18;11(7):e0158531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158531. eCollection 2016.
    • BRCA1/2 testing in newly diagnosed breast and ovarian cancer patients without prior genetic counselling: the DNA-BONus study.
    • Høberg-Vetti H, Bjorvatn C, Fiane BE, Aas T, Woie K, Espelid H, Rusken T, Eikesdal HP, Listøl W, Haavind MT, Knappskog PM, Haukanes BI, Steen VM, Hoogerbrugge N.
    • Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun;24(6):881-8. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.196. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
    • Prognostic Factors for Distress After Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer.
    • Voorwinden JS, Jaspers JP.
    • J Genet Couns. 2016 Jun;25(3):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9894-9. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
    • High Satisfaction and Low Distress in Breast Cancer Patients One Year after BRCA-Mutation Testing without Prior Face-to-Face Genetic Counseling.
    • Sie AS, Spruijt L, van Zelst-Stams WA, Mensenkamp AR, Ligtenberg MJ, Brunner HG, Prins JB, Hoogerbrugge N.
    • J Genet Couns. 2016 Jun;25(3):504-14. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9899-4. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
    • Impact of Genetic Counseling and Testing on Altruistic Motivations to Test for BRCA1/2: a Longitudinal Study.
    • Garg R, Vogelgesang J, Kelly K.
    • J Genet Couns. 2016 Jun;25(3):572-82. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9911-z. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
    • Prevalence and factors associated with cognitive deficit in women with gynecologic malignancies.
    • Van Arsdale A, Rosenbaum D, Kaur G, Pinto P, Kuo DY, Barrera R, Goldberg GL, Nevadunsky NS.
    • Gynecol Oncol. 2016 May;141(2):323-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
    • BRCA 1/2-negative patients who receive counseling after genetic testing have lower anxiety.
    • Printz C.
    • Cancer. 2016 Apr 15;122(8):1149. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30002.
    • Counselees' Expressed Level of Understanding of the Risk Estimate and Surveillance Recommendation are Not Associated with Breast Cancer Surveillance Adherence.
    • Albada A, van Dulmen S, Dijkstra H, Wieffer I, Witkamp A, Ausems MG.
    • J Genet Couns. 2016 Apr;25(2):279-89. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9869-x. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
    • Influence of Personal Exposure to the Cancer of a Loved One on the Breast Cancer Prevention Decisions of High Risk Women.
    • Padamsee TJ, Muraveva A, Wills C, Yee L, Paskett E.
    • Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Mar;25(3):561. 40th Annual (2016) ASPO meeting. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0090.
    • Conference abstract
    • Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires-an Italian exploratory study.
    • Catania C, Feroce I, Barile M, Goldhirsch A, De Pas T, de Braud F, Boselli S, Adamoli L, Radice D, Rossi A, Spitaleri G, Noberasco C, Bonanni B.
    • J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar;142(3):633-48. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-2062-7. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
    • Peer support and additional information in group medical consultations (GMCs) for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: A randomized controlled trial.
    • Visser A, van Laarhoven HW, Woldringh GH, Hoogerbrugge N, Prins JB.
    • Acta Oncol. 2016 Feb;55(2):178-87. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1049292. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
    • Does rapid genetic counseling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients cause additional psychosocial distress? results from a randomized clinical trial.
    • Wevers MR, Ausems MG, Verhoef S, Bleiker EM, Hahn DE, Brouwer T, Hogervorst FB, van der Luijt RB, van Dalen T, Theunissen EB, van Ooijen B, de Roos MA, Borgstein PJ, Vrouenraets BC, Vriens E, Bouma WH, Rijna H, Vente JP, Kieffer JM, Valdimarsdottir HB, Rutgers EJ, Witkamp AJ, Aaronson NK.
    • Genet Med. 2016 Feb;18(2):137-144. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.50. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
    • The Life Course Perspective: a Guide for Genetic Counselors.
    • Hamilton RJ, Innella NA, Bounds DT.
    • J Genet Couns. 2016 Feb;25(1):44-8. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9878-9. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
    • Experiences of Women Who Underwent Predictive BRCA 1/2 Mutation Testing Before the Age of 30.
    • Brunstrom K, Murray A, McAllister M.
    • J Genet Couns. 2016 Feb;25(1):90-100. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9845-5. Epub 2015 May 19.
    • Patient feedback and early outcome data with a novel tiered-binned model for multiplex breast cancer susceptibility testing.
    • Bradbury AR, Patrick-Miller LJ, Egleston BL, DiGiovanni L, Brower J, Harris D, Stevens EM, Maxwell KN, Kulkarni A, Chavez T, Brandt A, Long JM, Powers J, Stopfer JE, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM.
    • Genet Med. 2016 Jan;18(1):25-33. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.19. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
    • Discussing Genetic Testing With Patients With Breast Cancer in Developing Countries: Should We Be Judicious?
    • Hafeez Bhatti AB.
    • J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 10;33(35):4232-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.3974. Epub 2015 Sep 14.

    Related:

    Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer.

    Reply / Letter

    Reply to S.M. Sorscher and A.B. Hafeez Bhatti.

    • Psychological distress related to BRCA testing in ovarian cancer patients.
    • Bjørnslett M, Dahl AA, Sørebø Ø, Dørum A.
    • Fam Cancer. 2015 Dec;14(4):495-504. doi: 10.1007/s10689-015-9811-2.
    • "Maybe they have found something new" participants' views on returning cohort psychosocial survey results.
    • Bureau E, Pellegrini I, Noguès C, Lasset C, Julian-Reynier C.
    • Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2425-36. doi: 10.1111/hex.12211. Epub 2014 May 30.
    • Breast Cancer Genetic Testing: More Than a Medical Management Tool.
    • Schroeder D, Conroy SA.
    • Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Oct 1;19(5):603-7. doi: 10.1188/15.CJON.603-607.
    • Review
    • What Black Women Know and Want to Know About Counseling and Testing for BRCA1/2.
    • Adams I, Christopher J, Williams KP, Sheppard VB.
    • J Cancer Educ. 2015 Jun;30(2):344-52. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0740-9.
    • The Consequences of a BRCA Mutation in Women.
    • Famorca-Tran J, Roux G.
    • J Adv Pract Oncol. 2015 May-Jun;6(3):194-210. Epub 2015 May 1.
    • Routine assessment of psychosocial problems after cancer genetic counseling: results from a randomized controlled trial.
    • Eijzenga W, Bleiker EM, Ausems MG, Sidharta GN, Van der Kolk LE, Velthuizen ME, Hahn DE, Aaronson NK.
    • Clin Genet. 2015 May;87(5):419-27. doi: 10.1111/cge.12473. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
    • Feelings of Women With Strong Family Histories Who Subsequent to Their Breast Cancer Diagnosis Tested BRCA Positive.
    • Joseph M, Rab F, Panabaker K, Nisker J.
    • Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 May;25(4):584-92. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000403.
    • Pilot Testing of a Psycho-educational Telephone Intervention for Women Receiving Uninformative BRCA1/2 Genetic Test Results.
    • Maheu C, Meschino WS, Hu W, Honeyford J, Ambus I, Kidd M, Benea A, Gao X, Azadbakhsh M, Rochefort C, Esplen MJ.
    • Can J Nurs Res. 2015 Mar;47(1):53-71. doi: 10.1177/084456211504700105.
    • A survey of genetic counselors about the needs of 18-25 year olds from families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.
    • Werner-Lin A, Ratner R, Hoskins LM, Lieber C.
    • J Genet Couns. 2015 Feb;24(1):78-87. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9739-y. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
    • Prevalence and correlates of receiving and sharing high-penetrance cancer genetic test results: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey.
    • Taber JM, Chang CQ, Lam TK, Gillanders EM, Hamilton JG, Schully SD.
    • Public Health Genomics. [2015 Feb;]18(2):67-77. doi: 10.1159/000368745.
    • Population testing for cancer predisposing BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in the Ashkenazi-Jewish community: a randomized controlled trial.
    • Manchanda R, Loggenberg K, Sanderson S, Burnell M, Wardle J, Gessler S, Side L, Balogun N, Desai R, Kumar A, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Chapman C, Taylor R, Jacobs C, Tomlinson I, McGuire A, Beller U, Menon U, Jacobs I.
    • J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Nov 30;107(1):379. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju379. Print 2015 Jan.

    Related:

    Press: Current way of detecting gene mutations misses people at high risk of cancer. (Medical Xpress)

    Press: 'Screen more' for cancer risk genes. (BBC Health)

    Press: Population Genetic Testing Favored for BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutations in Ashkenazi-Jewish Women. (Medscape / Reuters Health)

    • From observation to intervention: development of a psychoeducational intervention to increase uptake of BRCA genetic counseling among high-risk breast cancer survivors.
    • Vadaparampil ST, Malo TL, Nam KM, Nelson A, de la Cruz CZ, Quinn GP.
    • J Cancer Educ. 2014 Dec;29(4):709-19. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0643-9.
    • Counselee participation in follow-up breast cancer genetic counselling visits and associations with achievement of the preferred role, cognitive outcomes, risk perception alignment and perceived personal control.
    • Albada A, Ausems MG, van Dulmen S.
    • Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;116:178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.012. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
    • Breast cancer information and support needs for women with intellectual disabilities: a scoping study.
    • Collins K, McClimens A, Mekonnen S, Wyld L.
    • Psychooncology. 2014 Aug;23(8):892-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.3500. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
    • Active approach for breast cancer genetic counseling during radiotherapy: long-term psychosocial and medical impact.
    • Baars JE, Bleiker EM, van Riel E, Rodenhuis CC, Velthuizen ME, Schlich KJ, Ausems MG.
    • Clin Genet. 2014 Jun;85(6):524-31. doi: 10.1111/cge.12335. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
    • More breast cancer patients prefer BRCA-mutation testing without prior face-to-face genetic counseling.
    • Sie AS, van Zelst-Stams WA, Spruijt L, Mensenkamp AR, Ligtenberg MJ, Brunner HG, Prins JB, Hoogerbrugge N.
    • Fam Cancer. 2014 Jun;13(2):143-51. doi: 10.1007/s10689-013-9686-z.
    • Psychosocial approaches to participation in BRCA1/2 genetic risk assessment among African American women: a systematic review.
    • Sherman KA, Miller SM, Shaw LK, Cavanagh K, Sheinfeld Gorin S.
    • J Community Genet. 2014 Apr;5(2):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0164-y. Epub 2013 Aug 10.
    • Which factors predict proposal and uptake of psychological counselling after BRCA1/2 test result disclosure?
    • Maheu C, Bouhnik AD, Nogues C, Mouret-Fourme E, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Lasset C, Berthet P, Fricker JP, Caron O, Luporsi E, Gladieff L, Julian-Reynier C.
    • Psychooncology. 2014 Apr;23(4):420-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.3435. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
    • Experiences of predictive testing in young people at risk of Huntington's disease, familial cardiomyopathy or hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
    • Macleod R, Beach A, Henriques S, Knopp J, Nelson K, Kerzin-Storrar L.
    • Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Mar;22(3):396-401. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.143. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
    • Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: A Systematic Review to Update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
    • Nelson HD, Pappas M, Zakher B, Mitchell JP, Okinaka-Hu L, Fu R.
    • Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 18;160(4):255-66.
    • Assessing the Genetic Risk for BRCA-Related Breast or Ovarian Cancer in Women: Recommendations From the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    • [No authors listed]
    • Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 18;160(4). doi: 10.7326/P14-9008.

    Related:

    Systematic Review:

    Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: A Systematic Review to Update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.

    • Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
    • Moyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    • Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 18;160(4):271-81.

    Related:

    Patient Education Handout:

    Summaries for patients. Assessing the genetic risk for BRCA-related breast or ovarian cancer in women: recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

    • Summaries for patients. Assessing the genetic risk for BRCA-related breast or ovarian cancer in women: recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    • [No authors listed]
    • Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 18;160(4):I-16.

    Related:

    Practice Guideline:

    Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

    • Genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer among Puerto Rican women living in the United States.
    • Scherr CL, Vasquez E, Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST.
    • Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2014;9(4):245-53.
    • Can we test for hereditary cancer at 18 years when we start surveillance at 25? Patient reported outcomes.
    • Sie AS, Prins JB, Spruijt L, Kets CM, Hoogerbrugge N.
    • Fam Cancer. 2013 Dec;12(4):675-82. doi: 10.1007/s10689-013-9644-9.
    • Implementation and outcomes of telephone disclosure of clinical BRCA1/2 test results.
    • Patrick-Miller L, Egleston BL, Daly M, Stevens E, Fetzer D, Forman A, Bealin L, Rybak C, Peterson C, Corbman M, Bradbury AR.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
    • Variants of unknown significance in BRCA testing: impact on risk perception, worry, prevention and counseling.
    • Richter S, Haroun I, Graham TC, Eisen A, Kiss A, Warner E.
    • Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov;24 Suppl 8:viii69-viii74. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt312.
    • Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress.
    • Culver J, Brinkerhoff C, Clague J, Yang K, Singh K, Sand S, Weitzel J.
    • Clin Genet. 2013 Nov;84(5):464-472. doi: 10.1111/cge.12097. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
    • Nonverbal communication and conversational contribution in breast cancer genetic counseling: Are counselors' nonverbal communication and conversational contribution associated with counselees' satisfaction, needs fulfillment and state anxiety in breast cancer genetic counseling?
    • Dijkstra H, Albada A, Klöckner Cronauer C, Ausems MG, van Dulmen S.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
    • The influence of dispositional optimism on post-visit anxiety and risk perception accuracy among breast cancer genetic counselees.
    • Wiering BM, Albada A, Bensing JM, Ausems MG, van Dulmen AM.
    • Psychooncology. 2013 Nov;22(11):2419-27. doi: 10.1002/pon.3292. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
    • Breast cancer in women at high risk: the role of rapid genetic testing for BRCA1 and -2 mutations and the consequences for treatment strategies.
    • Francken AB, Schouten PC, Bleiker EM, Linn SC, Rutgers EJ.
    • Breast. 2013 Oct;22(5):561-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.045. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
    • Review
    • Genetic counseling does not fulfill the counselees' need for certainty in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families: an explorative assessment.
    • Vos J, Menko FH, Oosterwijk JC, van Asperen CJ, Stiggelbout AM, Tibben A.
    • Psychooncology. 2013 May;22(5):1167-76. doi: 10.1002/pon.3125. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
    • Theory Development From Studies With Young Women With Breast Cancer Who Are BRCA Mutation Negative.
    • Hamilton R, Kopin S.
    • ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2013 Apr-Jun;36(2):E41-53. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0b013e3182901ff1.
    • The counselees' self-reported request for psychological help in genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer: not only psychopathology matters.
    • Vos J, van Asperen CJ, Oosterwijk JC, Menko FH, Collee MJ, Garcia EG, Tibben A.
    • Psychooncology. 2013 Apr;22(4):902-10. doi: 10.1002/pon.3081. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
    • Short-term psychological impact of the BRCA1/2 test result in women with breast cancer according to their perceived probability of genetic predisposition to cancer.
    • Brédart A, Kop JL, Depauw A, Caron O, Sultan S, Leblond D, Fajac A, Buecher B, Gauthier-Villars M, Noguès C, Flahault C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Dolbeault S.
    • Br J Cancer. 2013 Mar 19;108(5):1012-20. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.599. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
    • Dealing with the unexpected: consumer responses to direct-access BRCA mutation testing.
    • Francke U, Dijamco C, Kiefer AK, Eriksson N, Moiseff B, Tung JY, Mountain JL.
    • PeerJ. 2013 Feb 12;1:e8. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8. Print 2013.

    Related:

    Comments on NSGC Discussion Forum

    Subject: Current thoughts on 23andme?

    Press: Consumers have few negative reactions to the results of genetic testing for cancer mutations. (EurekAlert!)

    Press: Get ready for the risks of genetic testing. (CNN)

    • A follow-up study on men tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations: impacts and coping processes.
    • Shiloh S, Dagan E, Friedman I, Blank N, Friedman E.
    • Psychooncology. 2013 Feb;22(2):417-25. doi: 10.1002/pon.2106. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
    • Incorporating information regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis into discussions concerning testing and risk management for BRCA1/2 mutations: A qualitative study of patient preferences.
    • Hurley K, Rubin LR, Werner-Lin A, Sagi M, Kemel Y, Stern R, Phillips A, Cholst I, Kauff N, Offit K.
    • Cancer. 2012 Dec 15;118(24):6270-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27695. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
    • Cognitive and Psychological Impact of BRCA Genetic Counseling in Before and After Definitive Surgery Breast Cancer Patients.
    • Christie J, Quinn GP, Malo T, Lee JH, Zhao X, McIntyre J, Brzosowicz J, Jacobsen PB, Vadaparampil ST.
    • Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4003-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2460-x. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

    Related:

    News:

    Pretest genetic counseling informs patients with BRCA mutation.

    Press Release: Pre-Test Genetic Counseling Increases Cancer Knowledge for BRCA Patients (Moffitt Cancer Center)

    • What factors may influence psychological well being at three months and one year post BRCA genetic result disclosure?
    • Bosch N, Junyent N, Gadea N, Brunet J, Ramon Y Cajal T, Torres A, Graña B, Velasco A, Darder E, Mensa I, Balmaña J.
    • Breast. 2012 Dec;21(6):755-60. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
    • Moderators of cancer-related distress and worry after a pancreatic cancer genetic counseling and screening intervention.
    • Hart SL, Torbit LA, Crangle CJ, Esplen MJ, Holter S, Semotiuk K, Borgida A, Ardiles P, Rothenmund H, Gallinger S.
    • Psychooncology. 2012 Dec;21(12):1324-30. doi: 10.1002/pon.2026. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
    • Breast cancer genetic counseling after diagnosis but before treatment: A pilot study on treatment consequences and psychological impact.
    • Wevers MR, Hahn DE, Verhoef S, Bolhaar MD, Ausems MG, Aaronson NK, Bleiker EM.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.019. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

    Related:

    Comments from NSGC Discussion Forum Cancer SIG

    Subject: Article requests

    • Long-term follow-up of Jewish women with a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation who underwent population genetic screening.
    • Metcalfe KA, Mian N, Enmore M, Poll A, Llacuachaqui M, Nanda S, Sun P, Hughes KS, Narod SA.
    • Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(2):735-40. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1941-0. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
    • [Perception accuracy of BRCA1/2 mutation predisposition in breast cancer women and associated factors].
    • Leblond D, Brédart A, Dolbeault S, De Pauw A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Sultan S.
    • Bull Cancer. 2012 Jun;99(6):673-84.
    • [Article in French]
    • Psychological Distress with Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Case Report of an Unexpected BRCA Positive Test Result.
    • Dohany L, Gustafson S, Ducaine W, Zakalik D.
    • J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):399-401. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
    • Case Report
    • Influence of the family cluster effect on psychosocial variables in families undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    • Lapointe J, Abdous B, Camden S, Bouchard K, Goldgar D, Simard J, Dorval M.
    • Psychooncology. 2012 May;21(5):515-23. doi: 10.1002/pon.1936. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
    • When work, family and friendship collide.
    • Macshane M, Mountain H.
    • J Genet Couns. 2012 Apr;21(2):215-9. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
    • Sources of Uncertainty About Daughters' Breast Cancer Risk that Emerge During Genetic Counseling Consultations.
    • Bylund CL, Fisher CL, Brashers D, Edgerson S, Glogowski EA, Boyar SR, Kemel Y, Spencer S, Kissane D.
    • J Genet Couns. 2012 Apr;21(2):292-304. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
    • Long-term psychosocial outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: differences across affected status and risk-reducing surgery choice.
    • Graves KD, Vegella P, Poggi EA, Peshkin BN, Tong A, Isaacs C, Finch C, Kelly S, Taylor KL, Luta G, Schwartz MD.
    • Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Mar;21(3):445-55. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0991. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
    • Patient outcomes associated with group and individual genetic counseling formats.
    • Rothwell E, Kohlmann W, Jasperson K, Gammon A, Wong B, Kinney A.
    • Fam Cancer. 2012 Mar;11(1):97-106. doi: 10.1007/s10689-011-9486-2.
    • Exploring the short-term impact of DNA-testing in breast cancer patients: the counselees' perception matters, but the actual BRCA1/2 result does not.
    • Vos J, Oosterwijk JC, Gomez-Garcia E, Menko FH, Collee MJ, van Asperen CJ, Jansen AM, Stiggelbout AM, Tibben A.
    • Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):239-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.017. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
    • Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselees' perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA1/2-result.
    • Vos J, Gómez-García E, Oosterwijk JC, Menko FH, Stoel RD, van Asperen CJ, Jansen AM, Stiggelbout AM, Tibben A.
    • Psychooncology. 2012 Jan;21(1):29-42. doi: 10.1002/pon.1864. Epub 2010 Nov 11.